<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Converting CAD solids as closed MultiPatches in 3D Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/converting-cad-solids-as-closed-multipatches/m-p/1228645#M4830</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have DWG files with solids geometries.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I'm using&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/tool-reference/conversion/cad-to-geodatabase.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;CAD to GeoDatabase&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;on arcpro (2.9), some of the solids converted as closed multipatches and some as open multipatches. By running&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/3d-analyst/is-closed-3d.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Is Closed 3D&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;tool I can understand which of them are open/closed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know I can use the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/tool-reference/3d-analyst/enclose-multipatch.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Enclose Multipatch&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;tool but it's results are not good enough.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also don't understand if the problem is in the DWG drawing or in the conversion to gdb feature classes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can I validate that the solids in the DWG will be closed multipatch before or while I convert to feature classes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 06:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OfirMazor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-04T06:53:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Converting CAD solids as closed MultiPatches</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/converting-cad-solids-as-closed-multipatches/m-p/1228645#M4830</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have DWG files with solids geometries.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I'm using&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/tool-reference/conversion/cad-to-geodatabase.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;CAD to GeoDatabase&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;on arcpro (2.9), some of the solids converted as closed multipatches and some as open multipatches. By running&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/3d-analyst/is-closed-3d.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Is Closed 3D&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;tool I can understand which of them are open/closed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know I can use the&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/tool-reference/3d-analyst/enclose-multipatch.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Enclose Multipatch&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;tool but it's results are not good enough.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also don't understand if the problem is in the DWG drawing or in the conversion to gdb feature classes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how can I validate that the solids in the DWG will be closed multipatch before or while I convert to feature classes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 06:53:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/converting-cad-solids-as-closed-multipatches/m-p/1228645#M4830</guid>
      <dc:creator>OfirMazor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-04T06:53:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Converting CAD solids as closed MultiPatches</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/converting-cad-solids-as-closed-multipatches/m-p/1306499#M4889</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;I have a similar problem with solids created in Sketchup.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;In Sketchup, 3D cubatures (solids) are generated on the basis of polygons (from AGP) and these are returned to the GDB in ArcGIS PRo via the export interface via 3D-objects (e.g. DAE files).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;There they are displayed correctly as multipatches.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;But a volume calculation, for example, fails because the geometries are said to be not closed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;I don't know why that could be.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;A subsequent workaround with the "Enclose Multipatch" tool creates a new feature class with closed multipatches.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;However, no attribute fields are transferred, which have to be added afterwards in a further process.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;That's annoying.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 13:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/converting-cad-solids-as-closed-multipatches/m-p/1306499#M4889</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChristianVogt-Heinze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-07T13:07:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

