<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Scene Symbols in 3D Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/scene-symbols/m-p/685975#M4103</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The change to be able to use symbols in Scene is very welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1: A bug? When altering the range, no matter what minimum you choose, it goes back to 1. &amp;nbsp;Only after that can you reliably change it to another number. &amp;nbsp;It would be good to fix this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2: When choosing symbols, if you then decide something else would look better, it would be helpful for the existing symbol to be highlighted to differentiate it from the others.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3: With realistic symbols, some names would be useful e.g. for the trees - are they actual examples of trees (e.g. oak, beech) or generic (e.g. broad leaved deciduous).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4: With trees in particular, when you choose a range colour rather than a solid colour, the trees take on a slightly odd see-through quality when seen against the sky which makes them look less realistic - they let a bit too much sky through.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:12:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GeoNet</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-17T14:12:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Scene Symbols</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/scene-symbols/m-p/685975#M4103</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The change to be able to use symbols in Scene is very welcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1: A bug? When altering the range, no matter what minimum you choose, it goes back to 1. &amp;nbsp;Only after that can you reliably change it to another number. &amp;nbsp;It would be good to fix this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2: When choosing symbols, if you then decide something else would look better, it would be helpful for the existing symbol to be highlighted to differentiate it from the others.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3: With realistic symbols, some names would be useful e.g. for the trees - are they actual examples of trees (e.g. oak, beech) or generic (e.g. broad leaved deciduous).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4: With trees in particular, when you choose a range colour rather than a solid colour, the trees take on a slightly odd see-through quality when seen against the sky which makes them look less realistic - they let a bit too much sky through.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:12:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/scene-symbols/m-p/685975#M4103</guid>
      <dc:creator>GeoNet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-17T14:12:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

