<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic X3D export in 3D Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/x3d-export/m-p/46494#M342</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The X3D format is the successor to the VRML format for 3d content, for more than a decade. The format is well supported both offline and online with free and commercial viewers, and is still used in a wide cross-section of industry, government and personal environments. See Web3d.org for a good introduction and overview. X3D also has built-in geospatial support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcScene with 3d Analyst offers VRML scene export for many years. Is it time to update the aging export function to use X3D (perhaps while also fixing bugs) ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ESRI recommends using its own web scene format for CityEngine and offers a nice, optimized 3d web viewer for it. While it is great to have a fully integrated solution for easy consumption, there is a significant customer base who wants to takes this a step further and use the exported scene as data or as a sub-component in another system. X3D is a good option for that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thoughts ? Is there a ArcScene bug in this regard ? Would you benefit from X3D export ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any feedback appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:57:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AndreasPlesch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-06T18:57:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>X3D export</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/x3d-export/m-p/46494#M342</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The X3D format is the successor to the VRML format for 3d content, for more than a decade. The format is well supported both offline and online with free and commercial viewers, and is still used in a wide cross-section of industry, government and personal environments. See Web3d.org for a good introduction and overview. X3D also has built-in geospatial support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ArcScene with 3d Analyst offers VRML scene export for many years. Is it time to update the aging export function to use X3D (perhaps while also fixing bugs) ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ESRI recommends using its own web scene format for CityEngine and offers a nice, optimized 3d web viewer for it. While it is great to have a fully integrated solution for easy consumption, there is a significant customer base who wants to takes this a step further and use the exported scene as data or as a sub-component in another system. X3D is a good option for that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thoughts ? Is there a ArcScene bug in this regard ? Would you benefit from X3D export ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any feedback appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:57:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/x3d-export/m-p/46494#M342</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreasPlesch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-06T18:57:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X3D export</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/x3d-export/m-p/46495#M343</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;2000 views and no comments ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:35:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/x3d-export/m-p/46495#M343</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreasPlesch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-26T13:35:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X3D export</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/x3d-export/m-p/46496#M344</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Andreas,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you haven't&amp;nbsp;already done so, I would recommend posting this as an idea on the ArcGIS Ideas site:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/community/arcgis-ideas"&gt;https://community.esri.com/community/arcgis-ideas&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The user community vote&amp;nbsp;on ideas posted to ArcGIS Idea's and the popular ones are considered by Esri for implementation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:51:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/x3d-export/m-p/46496#M344</guid>
      <dc:creator>JackHardy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T11:51:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: X3D export</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/x3d-export/m-p/46497#M345</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jack,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;good idea ! Vote for X3D export here: &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/13596" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/13596&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:17:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/3d-questions/x3d-export/m-p/46497#M345</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreasPlesch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-22T08:17:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

