POST
|
Hi @JustinH Unfortunately, I have not. I wish I had better news for you.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
49
|
POST
|
Hi @Stephanie1 There is more than one way to accomplish what you want, but if you want to do so using an expression in the report template field, here is one way based on your example above: if(equals(triggerBody()?['feature']?['attributes']?['x'], '1'), '2b5b3e02f2de43b6b5026f07a5021fe9', '2e0d45fe4ed241a3894c452b0f648933') It goes without saying but ensure you replace the template IDs with your own. I have used one where it chose between 4 different templates based on two different attributes. See below. if(and(equals(triggerBody()?['feature']?['attributes']?['form'], 'tg'), equals(triggerBody()?['feature']?['attributes']?['rvra'], 'no')), '2b5b3e02f2de43b6b5026f07a5021fe9', if(and(equals(triggerBody()?['feature']?['attributes']?['form'], 'tg'), equals(triggerBody()?['feature']?['attributes']?['rvra'], 'yes')), '524bce6140394447a271cf2246617772', if(and(equals(triggerBody()?['feature']?['attributes']?['form'], 'mp'), equals(triggerBody()?['feature']?['attributes']?['rvra'], 'no')), 'b5b664adb80243658bbbc9545c0f04d0', '2e0d45fe4ed241a3894c452b0f648933'))) I hope this helps.
... View more
02-20-2024
05:54 AM
|
0
|
0
|
166
|
POST
|
This might not be your issue, but I'm hoping this might help others who are experiencing this error. Based on my past experiences with this error, it was due to the fact that the report was not generated, resulting in that error since there was no report to upload. While Survey123 showed it passed and did not fail, it technically failed. Most often than not, it was due to a missing token due to my Survey123 connection expiring after 2 weeks (organization policy). Check your Survey123 create report raw output to see if it says esriJobSucceeded. If it does not say that, then your report was not generated. See my screenshot where it shows it passed, but no report was created for it to upload. I hope this helps out.
... View more
02-06-2024
05:54 AM
|
0
|
3
|
261
|
POST
|
Unfortunately this token issue has started up again. My workaround did not solve the problem. Can anyone explain why I keep getting this error? I have had 4 failures this morning.
... View more
04-18-2023
09:22 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1425
|
POST
|
Hello I'm in search of suggestions or ideas one why this problem keeps happening. I thought I had the workaround for it, but apparently it is not. Here is the error I keep seeing when the create report is triggered. It is random and has no rhyme or reason. Create report will show: The problem isn't the upload file from URL, it is the create report step. It doesn't generate the report due to the missing token and causes the Upload file from URL to fail since there is no file to upload. When I pull up the raw output, this is what it says: { "statusCode": 200, "headers": { "Vary": "Origin,Accept-Encoding", "X-Frame-Options": "SAMEORIGIN", "Strict-Transport-Security": "max-age=63072000; includeSubdomains; preload", "X-Cache": "Miss from cloudfront", "X-Amz-Cf-Pop": "DFW56-P1", "X-Amz-Cf-Id": "Jo1GzdsXyLwoO__lWIXWWj6MlMyvx2EYcpgs0R0Vgxo0gi8Ufi4tLg==", "Timing-Allow-Origin": "*", "x-ms-apihub-cached-response": "false", "x-ms-apihub-obo": "false", "Date": "Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:55:22 GMT", "ETag": "W/\"5b-Mp2PQ3TXpicAGnrU8UOXH5yC4vQ\"", "Via": "1.1 2685f5b632da4ffa2ee376ec1418d378.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)", "Content-Length": "91", "Content-Type": "application/json" }, "body": { "error": { "message": "Missing required parameters: \"token\"", "code": "001" }, "success": false } } I originally thought it was because of my organization's login credentials expiring and that I needed to refresh my connections every week. This seemed to have worked for a few weeks, but started happening again. So that theory went out the window. Please help. Thank you. Bill
... View more
04-18-2023
05:55 AM
|
7
|
8
|
905
|
POST
|
Hi @JamieKelly1 Unfortunately, no. What I did do that may have resolved this problem is refresh my Survey123 connection within Power Automate, since it is my connection that is used every time the flow is triggered. My guess is that due to my organization, my OAuth token is expiring, causing it to fail. My workaround has been to refresh the connection weekly. I have not seen the flow fail with this same error since. I have however been getting failures due to the report generation timing out. This is another issue I haven't been able to figure out, since I can go in and generate the report just fine and other triggers were successful right before and after the random failure. Hopefully my workaround for the token issue resolves your problem though. Thanks.
... View more
03-31-2023
08:24 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1567
|
POST
|
This is awesome! Thank you @IsmaelChivite for posting. I did run into a problem. When I run the trigger, everything works great for me. When a user submits a survey, the process doesn't create the report and fails since there isn't anything to upload to OneDrive. It appears the token isn't being passed? Here is the Raw output from Create Report: { "statusCode": 200, "headers": { "Vary": "Origin,Accept-Encoding", "X-Frame-Options": "SAMEORIGIN", "Strict-Transport-Security": "max-age=63072000; includeSubdomains; preload", "X-Cache": "Miss from cloudfront", "X-Amz-Cf-Pop": "IAH50-C2", "X-Amz-Cf-Id": "oNnwc1YnZMG-Y6K9ujPRdY1fmryOjk5u4NxazeqXViwIDtlYtLgDtA==", "Timing-Allow-Origin": "*", "x-ms-apihub-cached-response": "true", "x-ms-apihub-obo": "false", "Date": "Wed, 22 Feb 2023 18:21:41 GMT", "ETag": "W/\"5b-Mp2PQ3TXpicAGnrU8UOXH5yC4vQ\"", "Via": "1.1 84bf46c54ab0942112fb280e02482cde.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)", "Content-Length": "91", "Content-Type": "application/json" }, "body": { "error": { "message": "Missing required parameters: \"token\"", "code": "001" }, "success": false } } Edit: I went back into the flow and added a timeout and retry policy of 1 hour under the Create Report settings. The flow worked this go around, but not sure if that was the fix.
... View more
02-22-2023
10:32 AM
|
0
|
4
|
2147
|
POST
|
Is there a limit to the available data in a feature layer to be filtered? For example, I have probably 12K+ features in a layer and one of the fields may have several thousand unique entries that I need users to be able to filter in the mobile app. When pulling up the filter for a field, 70+ features are already visible to choose from. Typing in the data to be filtered, it only seems to look in the pre-populated features mentioned earlier. It does not look through all 12K+ features. I get a "No results found matching..." I know the feature is there because when I search for it, I find it without issue. I do have the filters setup for the field I am searching within. Any ideas what could be happening or is my hunch correct that there is a limit? Thank you.
... View more
02-14-2023
10:01 AM
|
0
|
2
|
287
|
POST
|
@BarbaraWebster1 I am still seeing this issue on Windows 10 and Apple products. Android still displays properly. I unfortunately am not able to update my Windows 10 to the latest being I am at the mercy of my organization. We are on Windows 10 Enterprise version 22H2, build 19045.2311. As @NicholasDay posted, who is another publisher where I'm at, he is seeing it using his iPad. Thanks.
... View more
12-28-2022
11:21 AM
|
0
|
0
|
812
|
POST
|
@GregKeith I have the survey set to pages dynamic-grid and the groups do not have any override because I want them to remain dynamic-grid. It is very odd that this is occurring.
... View more
06-09-2022
11:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
388
|
POST
|
I sent you a DM with the XLSForm. Thank you for looking into this.
... View more
06-09-2022
11:35 AM
|
0
|
6
|
1008
|
POST
|
Hello I am having an issue with placeholderText=@[hint] causing a huge gap between the label and the entry box. This occurs on the PC and iPhone field apps (see Pic #1). When viewing in Connect and an Android field app, it displays correctly (see Pic #2). This is happening on multiple fields, but the one shown in the pictures below is a text field with the words "if applicable" typed into the hint column. Is this a known issue and if so, is there a suggested fix? Thank. Connect v3.14.281 Field App v3.14.262 Pic #1 on PC field app that shows gap. Pic #2 on Connect that shows no gap.
... View more
06-09-2022
09:34 AM
|
1
|
11
|
1331
|
IDEA
|
I would like to upvote this because I would like to have borders on some questions within a theme-grid. Sometimes adding borders gives a sharper look. With that being said, read below. I discovered a workaround by accident and have started using this method in all my surveys. I thought I would share this in case anyone else would like to use it. I set my surveys to pages only, being my surveys consist of several pages. Then I assign an appearance of w2, w3, etc... to groups I want to have more than one column. No borders are seen anywhere unless I want one. Then I just set borderColor="black" or whatever. I would like to add that fields within these groups with more than one column will always be w1. For example, if you set a group to w2 and want the question to use up the entire w2 width, it will not. It will remain w1. So one will need to be creative when working this way. Here is an example of one of my groups set to w2. Notice no borders. This is an example of a group set to w2 with nested groups with borders. I apologize if this method has been known, I just wanted to provide a workaround that may not have been known.
... View more
06-08-2022
07:01 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1067
|
POST
|
Hello I would like to inquire if the priority has been increased for this issue. I recently have been trying to use a dynamic placeholderText=@[hint] and the lightbulb still appears as if I have a guidance_hint entered. Thank you.
... View more
06-03-2022
09:25 AM
|
0
|
0
|
714
|
POST
|
I found the culprit but not sure why it was doing what it was doing. A calculation used for relevancy was still able to count fields with a default value of 1 in three different groups when only one group was relevant. The value from the calculation should have only been one, not three. Basically, the calculation should have been 1=1, making it TRUE, but instead it was coming out to 3=1, making if FALSE. I simplified the calculation and removed the problem fields. Crisis averted for now, but don't know how it was counting fields that were not relevant. The method I was using was in place for years until now. 😕
... View more
04-15-2022
11:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
216
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 12-09-2021 07:47 AM | |
1 | 04-18-2023 09:22 AM | |
7 | 04-18-2023 05:55 AM | |
1 | 03-31-2023 08:24 AM | |
1 | 06-09-2022 09:34 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
Thursday
|