POST
|
This worked like a charm! I knew I was missing something so obvious. Thank you so much. I did the interpolations at 100,300 and 500m. There are slight differences. The prediction surface seems to be larger as the resolution gets higher.
... View more
08-04-2015
03:28 PM
|
1
|
0
|
365
|
POST
|
Hello!! I've been having a hard time figuring out what I'm doing wrong. I'm interpolating radon levels for certain areas in Sweden and I wanted to see the results of the interpolations at 300 and 500m resolutions in contrast to 100m. These are the steps I took on ArcMap 10.2.2.: Geo processing>environments> processing extent: "same as display"> Raster analysis, Cell size: "as specified below", 300. I repeated the same steps and changed to 500 I don't see any difference at all in the appearance of my map. It looks exactly the same. Is there something I'm doing wrong? Are there other ways to change resolutions of the interpolation results? I am using IDWA and Ordinary Kringing methods. I would appreciate any help here!! Thanks!
... View more
07-30-2015
11:10 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2968
|
POST
|
Hello!! First time poster here with a quick question. I want to cross-validate my IDWA and Kringing interpolation database. I am working on an ArcMap 10.2.2. Does this wizard exist in this version? if so where is it located? I could not find it in the geostatistical analyst tool box. Thanks a lot NN
... View more
06-22-2015
06:43 AM
|
0
|
1
|
5989
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 08-04-2015 03:28 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
11-11-2020
02:25 AM
|