POST
|
When viewing a map, click Add>Add Map Notes. This creates a layer that you can add simple features to. OMG, Mike, you are my life saver. Thanks! I thought I was going crazy not finding this feature. It's not intuitive at all...
... View more
07-02-2014
11:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
245
|
POST
|
Hi all, Am I blind or it's not possible to create simple features (i.e. points, lines, and polygons) directly in AGOL without having to preload a feature layer from an external source prior?! I swear God I had an impression that this was possible, at least in earlier releases. Is it me or something have changed recently? IMHO, creation of simple features is a base function that MUST be present in a SaaS solution. Otherwise it doesn't make sense, don't you think? Max
... View more
07-02-2014
10:47 PM
|
0
|
2
|
615
|
POST
|
Hi All, Back to the AGOL Terms of use. Say, a legit client digitizes buildings upon AGOL basemaps and carries out verctor layer with building polygons. Question: Are the free to distribute their polygon layer as they will or is this illegal? I know for fact, that if they were to place dots on the map each representing a building location it would be okay to re-distribute them after. Nevertheless, I'm not 100% sure if the same applies to polygons (or lines for that matter in case of digitizing streets...) Thanks in advance! Max
... View more
02-25-2014
10:56 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1207
|
POST
|
...where it can get into violating the terms of use is when headless accounts are created and shared between individuals. Documentation on licensing and terms of use can be found here: http://www.esri.com/legal/software-license Hi Andrew, Thanks for the prompt response. Well, I guess I'd ask you to elaborate on the above a bit. In particular, what is considered a "headless account"? For instance, if my client buys an AGOL subscription for 5 named-users, and provides 1 or 2 of those to their end-user (from another organization, who do not have an AGOL subscription themselves), in order for the latter to see the results of the analysis and maps that have been created. In other words, two organizations will be using single AGOL subscription - will this be a violation? As for the legal documentation, would you be able to point to a particular section pertaining to AGOL usage? Thanks, Max
... View more
11-17-2013
08:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1207
|
POST
|
Good day, Everyone! A client of mine has asked me a question on whether or not it would be possible for them to have an AGOL subscription for their organization, and share it with external clients (i.e. if they have 5 named users: 3 from within their company, and 2 used by external clients that do not belong to their organization). I recall reading somewhere that such a practice would be against AGOL terms of use. Nonetheless, I may be wrong. If I am correct, though, I can't seem to find any formal documentation on this particular matter anywhere on the web. Could someone please point me to such documentation if it exists? Thanks, Max
... View more
11-14-2013
02:32 AM
|
0
|
5
|
2098
|
POST
|
Do you know if this is still the case? Is there documentation of this somewhere? Hi Sarah, While I couldn't find any formal documentation on this either, the aforementioned notion still holds true, i.e. only the Owner or Admin can export features from AGOL hosted feature service. Thanks, Max
... View more
07-15-2013
06:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1352
|
POST
|
One of the users has experienced an issue where the City Engine 2012.1 was looking for the 'esriLincense.config' file under his roaming user profile (i.e. \\<server>\<profile>\esriLicense.config) - while the file was actually present under the local user profile on C:\. The user is on Win7 64-bit with ArcGIS Desktop 10.1 installed. Could anyone please confirm if the aforementioned patch only fixes the City Engine 2012 authorization issues pertaining to the cases where the ArcGIS 10.0 is installed OR could be used with the 10.1 present on the system, as well? Thanks, Max
... View more
03-27-2013
12:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1031
|
POST
|
Nevermind my previous post - I've figured out what the problem was. Essentially, my multipatch was in the UTM projection based on the NAD27 datum, while the surface was based on the NAD83 datum. I've re-projected the original multipatch to NAD83 UTM Zone 18N, added it to the ArcScene, applied the base-heights from the surface, and re-ran the Layer 3D to Feature Class tool - the resulting output multipatch retained the raster surface elevation values within it. Issue solved, thanks for your help! Max
... View more
03-20-2013
07:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
359
|
POST
|
Hi Prasanta, Thanks for the advise. However, when I ran the tool and added the resulting multipatch in my ArcScene, I've noticed two issues: 1) There were no elevation values associated with the new multipatch, unlike we were expecting - it was flat; 2) I couldn't even apply my raster surface elevation values to the newly created multipatch - it stays flat, and doesn't want to "float" on the surface no matter what I do. Any thoughts on why this is happening? Any other workarounds to try for my original question? Thanks, Max
... View more
03-20-2013
07:11 AM
|
0
|
0
|
359
|
POST
|
Hi All, I have a raster Grid file with elevation values. In ArcScene I can display a Multipatch shapefile (or feature class) floating on top of the raster surface (see the attached screenshot), based on the elevation values of the latter (i.e. raster). However, I'm wondering if there is a way to export those elevation values from the raster and then apply them to the multipatch to store permanently (i.e. I want my multipatch to have it's own elevation values corresponding to those of the respective surface). If anyone has done anything similar, please advised on the steps required. Thanks, Max
... View more
03-18-2013
06:35 AM
|
0
|
4
|
654
|
POST
|
Hi All, I have a raster Grid file with elevation values. In ArcScene I can display a Multipatch shapefile (or feature class) floating on top of the raster surface (see the attached screenshot), based on the elevation values of the latter (i.e. raster). However, I'm wondering if there is a way to export those elevation values from the raster and then apply them to the multipatch to store permanently (i.e. I want my multipatch to have it's own elevation values corresponding to those of the respective surface). If anyone has done anything similar, please advised on the steps required. Thanks, Max
... View more
03-18-2013
06:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
379
|