Latest Contributions by MitchellOttesen1

If I have a dynamic map service with feature access enabled, and the feature service has attachments enabled, a FeatureLayer object created from a layer in the MAP service will show that attachment capabilities are enabled. However, if I try to post a new attachment with the addAttachment() method, the API throws an error, so as a work-a-round, I have to grab the URL, replace 'MapServer' with 'FeatureService', create a new FeatureLayer object, and post the attachment. If the FeatureLayer object is able to detect that the map service's associated feature service has attachment capabilities, should the object be able to know how to post attachments to that feature service? Here's a console.log of the error that takes place inside the 4x API   ... View more

The input unit is in ft and I'm expecting the output to be in meters. This is based on the units that are in the vcsWkid parameters. As you can see, the returned Z-value is not changed. I also checked to see if there are any transformations, none were returned.   ... View more

In 3.x API, whether a webmapid is used to create the map object or not, layers in the map seem to be ordered by what type of Map Service they are. No matter what order they're added to the map object. This is the order, top to bottom, based on my observations: Feature Layers (whether they are in the web map or not) Dynamic Map Service Tiled Map Services / Vector Tile Layers WMS layers Basemap in Web Map (if webmapid was used to create map object) With 4.x API, I'm not seeing the same logic, it's like it creates a Web Map sandwich: Feature Layers in Web Map WMS Layer in Web Map Dynamic Map layer (not in web map) Feature Layers (not in web map) Tiled Map Services / Vector Tile Layers  (not in web map) Basemap in Web Map (if webmapid was used to create map) What I'm hoping for is that dynamic map services and/or feature layers not in the web map would be able to draw on top, but they aren't. They're getting covered up by the WMS Web Map layer. Again, this regardless of what order they're added to the map. ... View more

The latest version of Survey123 isn't populating the token in the webhook. Any reason why? James Tedrick ... View more

James Tedrick‌, In an Integromat workflow, after a survey is submitted for the first time, I use a webhook and HTTP to hit the updateFeatures endpoint to update the values of two fields that are hidden from the survey. I'm finding that when I edit and re-send the survey, that the values of the two hidden fields I had previously updated aren't being persisted with the re-send webhook, but it seems that the field default values are, probably because that's how the Form has it stored. For now, my way around this is to use Inbox criteria based on the value of the hidden fields to re-open and submit surveys, rather than the Sent folder. In the sent folder, are the objectid and globalId values stored? Perhaps a refresh option in the Sent folder could help prevent values from being replaced by default form values. ... View more

I have a map document with layers that contain 1:M relationships as well as M:N relationships from a SDE. When publishing as Map & Feature Services, the M:N relationships are found in the Map Service rather than in the feature service as which is where I would expect them to be. Any ideas on why this is? ... View more

ArcGIS Enterprise is giving me a lot of trouble when it comes to having Field Domains, currently have an ongoing case with Esri Support. A workaround I thought that might work would be to publish the layer in ArcGIS Online, where Field Domains work flawlessly. Then publish the layer in ArcGIS Enterprise without the field domains (It fails to publish when I have field domains in the fgdb, again, ongoing case with Esri Support), then use the JSON definition of the Feature Service in AGOL and pop it into the JSON definition of the Feature Service in ArcGIS Enterprise. Except for one thing that I noticed... In ArcGIS Enterprise, when I pull up the JSON definition using ArcGIS Online Assistant (ago-assistant.esri.com), it doesn't have a "Data" component that lists all the layers in the Feature Service. Even though the Feature Service definitely has layers that I'm able to pull into a Web Map and edit, etc. Any ideas on why the Item's JSON is different in Enterprise than in AGOL? Even though the Feature Services are basically the same, except for the lack of Field Domains in Enterprise, the JSON definition of the Feature Service in Enterprise is missing the "data" component that contains the information for the layers, pop-ups, etc. ... View more