POST
|
@SteveMcCarthy @GeoJosh Any update to this? Having the same issue at 2023.2.
... View more
a week ago
|
0
|
2
|
22
|
POST
|
Hope this helps @matt_g_g. If you have a moment @HusseinNasser2 my issue is a little different.. I can point you over to this thread if you would be willing to offer some advice. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-questions/field-maps-constraint-rule-feature-form-caching/td-p/1396877. It would be much appreciated!
... View more
03-19-2024
03:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
79
|
POST
|
Any chance you resolved your issue? I'm encountering something very similar in Field Maps. Tagging @HusseinNasser2 if you have any insight.
... View more
03-18-2024
07:17 PM
|
0
|
2
|
102
|
IDEA
|
I’ve come across what I think is a bug related to this in enterprise 11.1. I have a constraint attribute rule that checks some data and rejects the edit if not correct. When this occurs an error message appears like it should. In my circumstance when a certain field is switched to a certain value, it is locked from editing, and when user clicks submit the constraint is checked. If there is an error, the user has to Cancel the edit, click Edit again to launch the form, which should set it that locked field back to its previous value (unlocking it), but unfortunately that doesn’t occur. If the user clicks Edit again and the form launches they see the same values as they had before clicking Cancel (field is locked). They have to reload the entire map to get the form to appear correctly. edit: I thought have this option disabled fixed the problem, but it appears not.
... View more
03-16-2024
01:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
88
|
POST
|
I have a Constraint Attribute Rule setup in ArcGIS Pro. I am running Enterprise 11.1 and have a feature service referencing data in an Enterprise Geodatabase. It is non-versioned, archive enabled. This constraint rule validates some data when a user submits a record through Field Maps and returns a custom error message if the data isn't valid. My issue is best described through an example. I take a record that had no errors and edit it, launching the form. I then edit that record again, this time supplying data that violates the constraint and should error out. I then attempt to submit that record and receive the custom error message as expected. This error message allows me to close it by clicking "OK", which closes that message. I then hit Cancel to return to the previous page (the records popup). When I do, I get another error "ERROR Geodatabase field not found" (can not figure out why this is popping up, but not the main issue). I click OK to close that window and it takes me back to the popup. I then click Edit on that window again, which brings up the form, but all of the erroneous data I supplied in the previous edit is still there as if it had successfully submitted in the previous edit. I know for a fact it didn't submit since I can look at the table within the database. In addition, when I completely exit the map, reload it, navigate back to that record and begin editing it I then see the correct non-erroneous data. It's almost if Field Maps is caching the form data for some reason.. Any help would be appreciated! I'm tagging @JeffShaner @JamesTedrick @BrettStokes as I watched your session at the dev summit virtually, but could not be there in person to ask this question. -EDIT After a lot more trial and error, I still haven't resolved the issue. It seems like the error, "ERROR Geodatabase field not found", is related to the issue and triggered by anytime I return an error message in an attribute rule. I've tried this on both calculation and constraint rules and both lead to the same result. I've even simplified the rule down to return {'errorMessage': 'This message triggered'} so I could trigger the error every time and sure enough I run into the issue. Is this the expected behavior? I've tried the same edit in Collector and while I don't get the error message, I do raise an error and cancel that edit then return to the form with the form reset to the correct data. - EDIT 2 Last follow up here. I've resolved the issue in a non ideal way. The table I was using is part of the feature layer item and was added to the map with the rest of the layers in the item. I removed this table from the map and added it back directly from the service url and that seems to have fixed the issue.
... View more
03-15-2024
05:51 PM
|
0
|
1
|
183
|
POST
|
At the dev summit a sample analysis was shown around the 35 minute mark. @AndrewSakowicz you mentioned sharing the queries used to build that analysis but I didn't see any follow up on that. It would be great to have access to those. If they're available could you point the way?
... View more
03-15-2024
07:22 AM
|
1
|
6
|
434
|
POST
|
I have a Constraint Attribute Rule setup in ArcGIS Pro. I am running Enterprise 11.1 and have a feature service referencing data in an Enterprise Geodatabase. This constraint rule validates some data when a user submits a record through Field Maps and returns a custom error message if the data isn't valid. The validation works great in a "live" map within Field Maps and returns the full error message. When the data is offline and synced the validation appears to work as the record isn't allowed to be submit, but it only returns a generic error message. Is this the intended behavior or am I missing something?
... View more
03-11-2024
07:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
178
|
POST
|
@MarkBockenhauer when I set the "Device Will Download and Get Update to Features Only" option I don't get any attachments, even the ones I created, within the offline area. That makes sense to me based off the description, but your comment "In Field Maps users will see that there is an attachment for the feature, but it will not be downloaded unless the user taps on it to download it." seems to indicate that I should be able to see them and download them by clicking. Am I missing something?
... View more
03-06-2024
11:59 AM
|
0
|
0
|
67
|
POST
|
Is this still an issue? Looking at the bug https://support.esri.com/en-us/bug/attachments-are-not-submitted-when-editing-or-adding-fe-bug-000157495 I don't see how this is considered a "fix".
... View more
03-05-2024
09:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
126
|
DOC
|
Could we expect an upgrade to the python version in the next major release of ArcGIS Pro?
... View more
01-03-2024
08:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1855
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 03-15-2024 07:22 AM | |
1 | 09-26-2023 02:22 PM | |
1 | 09-28-2023 07:34 AM | |
1 | 09-11-2023 03:02 PM | |
1 | 02-02-2020 06:58 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
Tuesday
|