POST
|
The following is a screen capture running one of the examples consuming a tiled map service slow tile rendering.mov - Google Drive Tile fetching is slow. Running a similar test using the js-apis (on the same network) - stuff runs fast. Thanks, Kristoffer
... View more
04-26-2016
01:10 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2651
|
POST
|
Hi, I´m getting a crash in the geometry engine when projecting an AGSPolygon. I believe this is caused by a geometry with two identical points in a ring {rings = (((354027,6711767.4),(354027,6711767.4),(354026.5,6711771.4),(354027,6711767.4))). spatialReference = {wkid = 32633}} -a simplifygeometry prior the projection does not trigger the crash. Thanks, Kristoffer
... View more
04-26-2016
01:07 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2783
|
POST
|
Shimin, that´s a great (and very simple) idea:) Thanks!
... View more
12-04-2015
12:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
504
|
POST
|
Hi Shimin, This is one of many layers in the gdb, and we´d like to keep the other layers in sync with server even when no changes has been done to this "upload-only"-layer. Perhaps adding some changes to some dummy object could be a workaround. Another workaround may be to add a dummy query filter upon creation of this layer, ensuring nothing ever gets downloaded (using bidirectional sync). Thanks, Kristoffer
... View more
12-03-2015
02:06 PM
|
0
|
2
|
504
|
POST
|
Sure, or use something else than Github (that does not have file-size og repo-size limits).
... View more
11-19-2015
02:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1184
|
POST
|
(..Or choose another provider for the code that does not have any 200M limit;)
... View more
11-18-2015
12:55 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1184
|
POST
|
Hi, the AGSGDBFeature cannot be saved to disk like this, as it does not subclass NSCoder. I guess a reasonable question is why you want to persist the AGSGDBFeatures yourself - why not use the AGSGDBFeatureTable´s saveFeature?
... View more
11-11-2015
03:11 AM
|
0
|
2
|
547
|
POST
|
We worked around this by fetching and persisting as fresh copies as possible of the feature layer definitions of all relevant layers. Since they contain all domain values, we present these to the user when editing a domain attribute.
... View more
10-28-2015
12:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
198
|
POST
|
Hi, we´re still seeing a delay on 10.2.6. It´s better though: Down from 60 to about 10s in my current setup.
... View more
09-25-2015
05:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
679
|
POST
|
I verified that the issue persist on 10.2.5. You´ll find the full backtrace in the comment on the modified sample (linked above). In our app, we don´t have the concept of switching between online and offline. The user is "always offline" (in terms of creating/editing features). We trigger agsgdb-sync in the background at regular intervals, so yes, it does happen that the user perform edits while sync is fired. We don´t see this crash too often now, but we´re working on adding a new feature that continuously logs accelerometer data from the device, making us more vunerable for this issue. Thanks, Kristoffer
... View more
09-04-2015
02:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
343
|
POST
|
Hi, we´re running iOS Runtime SDK 10.2.4, and our app is terminating in libc++abi.dylib: terminating with uncaught exception of type Esri_runtimecore::Geodatabase::geodatabase_error: std::exception thrown by Esri_runtimecore::Geodatabase::Sqlite_database::execute_sql(std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> > const&) + 500 I believe this crash is caused by saving/adding new features while synchonizing the agsgdb-geodatabase. I´ve modified one of the samples to repro the issue (go offline, add a feature (a save-loop i started), synchonize). Is this a non-supported scenario? Thanks, Kristoffer
... View more
08-25-2015
10:56 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2902
|
POST
|
You´re right - new feature layers need to be added to the "all-layers-service", but afaik, you´d still need to re-genereate the offline geodatabase, as the layerIds you´d like to sync are specified in the AGSGDBGenerateParameters. Question is, what you´d like to happen. As new services are added, you´d like them to appear in the app? Even if you were able to keep multiple feature services in one offline base, you´d still need to re-create the offline geodatabase. Thus, perhaps it then actually makes more sense to keep the services separated, adding new services (and corresponding offline geodatabases) as they are published.
... View more
06-30-2015
01:36 AM
|
0
|
1
|
667
|
POST
|
Hi Hrishikesh, Afaik, it´s not possible to join multiple services into a single client-side geodatabase. What we´ve done in our project is simply generating multiple geodatabases on the client. On top of this, we´ve built a small abstraction layer hiding the fact that there actually are multiple geodatabases in the bottom, making it all easy to work with. In your case it seems all feature feature services reside on the same physical server. Is it possible to publish a new, single feature service containing all the feature layers required by your app? Kristoffer
... View more
06-30-2015
01:15 AM
|
0
|
3
|
667
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 11-18-2014 03:32 AM | |
3 | 11-06-2014 06:19 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
11-10-2022
08:24 AM
|