IDEA
|
Adding a vote for this request - we need at least all current editing functionality of WAB to be available in EB, including: Copy-paste Select / add to selection / remove from selection / clear selection An efficient attribute editor Cut Union/merge Reshape Delete Undo/Redo Batch attribute Edit related tables Add attachments Editing that respects requirements of smart forms (e.g. un-editable fields, required fields)
... View more
11-29-2023
02:44 PM
|
0
|
0
|
617
|
DOC
|
I will add a 'vote' (more of a desperate plea) to PLEASE enhance the functionality of the edit widget in EB to at least the same standard as that currently available in WAB. We have an organisation of over 100 dispersed users who currently do all of their data editing in WAB, and our operations will be rendered unusable if WAB is retired before EB has these capabilities. Functions in WAB which are absolutely essential for our workflows are copy-paste (currently in smart editor in WAB), cut, union/merge, reshape, select and add/subtract from selection, undo/redo, the ability to edit related tables, and an editor that respects the requirements of smart forms. Other widgets which also do not meet even the same functionality (or exist at all) in EB which are critical include batch attribute and group filter. We will not be able to migrate to EB until these capabilities are available in EB. And to show that my organisation is not alone with these requirements, here's a few links to some relevant community posts all pleading for the same things: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-ideas/edit-widget-in-experience-builder/idi-p/1294751 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-questions/copy-features-function-missing-from-experience/m-p/1330210 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-ideas/add-batch-edit-widget-to-experience-builder/idi-p/1220452 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-questions/edit-widget-only-partially-implemented-where-is/m-p/1349511 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-questions/advanced-editing/m-p/1315790 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-questions/experience-builder-edit-related-tables/m-p/1244113 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-questions/experience-builder-edit-related-tables/m-p/1244113 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-questions/batch-editing-in-experience-builder/m-p/1193032 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-questions/edit-widget-not-respecting-requirements-of-smart/m-p/1300476 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-questions/edit-widget-not-working-correctly-only-working/m-p/1316161 https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-ideas/add-split-merge-circle-copy-in-edit-widget/idi-p/1147136
... View more
11-29-2023
02:38 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2852
|
POST
|
Adding the functions which are currently available and working well in WAB would be a start - including cut, union, reshape and undo/redo. These are critical for our current workflows and we will not be moving to EB without this functionality being available.
... View more
11-28-2023
09:48 PM
|
1
|
0
|
212
|
POST
|
Fully agree with this request. The cut, union, reshape, attribute edit, select (including add/subtract from selection) and the undo/redo functions of the Edit widget in WAB are fundamental to our current organisational app deployment model, in which our users do all of their data editing within the Web App instead of relying on desktop software (like Pro). These functions are critical for our current workflows, and we will not be able to move to EB until they are available.
... View more
11-28-2023
09:46 PM
|
3
|
0
|
366
|
POST
|
Our organisation also uses the copy-paste function in the Smart Editor in WAB as a core workflow step for our users to create new data with high integrity. It is an absolutely essential functionality for our organisation and we cannot move to EB until this is addressed.
... View more
11-28-2023
09:39 PM
|
4
|
0
|
288
|
IDEA
|
Absolutely essential tool, when can we expect the functionality to be available?
... View more
11-28-2023
09:19 PM
|
0
|
0
|
791
|
POST
|
Thanks @gis_KIWI4 - does applying the settings in Field Maps Designer work for layers that need forms applied for Web Apps? Just trying to understand your advice in relation to my workflow where we would require form configurations on layers used in maps for Field Maps as well as maps used in Web Apps....
... View more
10-25-2023
08:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
305
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Online is automatically reordering fields into alphabetical order in pop-ups, rather than retaining the field order we set in the database prior to publishing. This is an extremely annoying and inconvenient issue - which seems to only have appeared recently with the latest AGOL updates. Previously, field order was retained in the pop-ups once services were registered in AGOL. We deliberately set the desired order of fields in the database prior to publishing to minimise the time-consuming task of configuring pop-ups in AGOL as much as possible. Where we have services which have a large number of fields, the time cost of reordering the fields is very large. We are already aware of other configurations set in Pro which do not flow through to AGOL, but field ordering was previously one configuration that actually worked as it should, so it's painful to see that even this is no longer functioning properly.
... View more
10-25-2023
08:28 PM
|
1
|
0
|
264
|
POST
|
Hello, I have noticed that the Forms function, which previously could be accessed via the Visualisation tab in AGOL, has now moved to the Map Viewer interface itself. This means that if settings applied in a form (e.g. which fields are editable and which are not) are required in multiple maps, the work to set these up needs to be duplicated for each map in which the layer is used. This is rather more inconvenient than being able to apply the form settings at the layer level, and then if that layer is used in multiple maps, the settings are applied across all. Is there a work around that allows us to set form configurations at the layer level, so that we do not have to duplicate work across multiple maps where the layer is used?
... View more
10-22-2023
07:54 PM
|
0
|
3
|
433
|
POST
|
Hello, We regularly create views from our parent feature services. Recently, the way view definitions are configured in AGOL has changed. We used to define the view by first creating it, then navigating through the visualisation tab to the view definition options, setting the desired filter definition, and saving the layer. Now, we are prompted to set the view definition as the view is being created, through the new view definition interface. We have discovered that when the definition is set at this point through the new interface, it is not retained when creation of the view is completed, and instead all data is brought into the view, despite a filter being defined previously. When we inspect the view settings, it is clear no filters have been retained. We can only get the definition filter to 'stick' when we go back in to edit the view after it has been created, and update the view settings again. In addition, when we go to reset the view definition in the settings tab, we can only update one layer at a time. If we attempt to update multiple layers without pressing 'Update' in between each one, the definition is again not retained. We have to apply the definition to each individual layer for it to work. This creates a fair amount of inefficiency and unreliability in the process.
... View more
05-11-2022
05:11 PM
|
0
|
0
|
257
|
POST
|
Just giving this a bump to see if anyone can provide any new insight to this issue.
... View more
05-11-2022
05:01 PM
|
0
|
0
|
245
|
POST
|
Hi MJ, I have updated to the new version of Connect and have not encountered the problem (yet). Many thanks for you help.
... View more
10-19-2021
06:43 PM
|
1
|
1
|
510
|
POST
|
Hello, I am encountering an issue where I have formatted a 'required' repeat field with a repeat count of 100 set in my survey design, which functions as expected when the survey is launched through Survey 123, preventing the survey from being submitted if the required 100 repeat responses are not completed. However, when the survey is launched through a link in the pop-up of a different feature service in Field Maps (mobile app, not web app), the required controls are not applied and it is possible to submit the survey without the required 100 repeat responses being populated. Strangely, if you don't enter any responses in the repeat, you cannot submit the form, but if you enter 1 response in the repeat, you can submit the form.... Many thanks for any advice!
... View more
10-19-2021
06:20 PM
|
0
|
1
|
763
|
POST
|
Hi MJ, Thanks for your response. Yes this is happening with multiple surveys, and does not necessarily relate to changes in a repeat. I have found it is most likely related to the addition of new fields in the survey. I have Survey 123 Connect version 3.12 currently installed, but can test updating to v3.13. Is this the correct procedure for updating Connect versions? https://support.esri.com/en/technical-article/000023877 Thanks for your help!
... View more
10-17-2021
03:03 PM
|
0
|
3
|
517
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 11-28-2023 09:48 PM | |
1 | 10-25-2023 08:28 PM | |
3 | 11-28-2023 09:46 PM | |
4 | 11-28-2023 09:39 PM | |
1 | 04-28-2021 10:23 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
02-22-2024
05:10 AM
|