Latest Contributions by IanPryor1

‎02-15-2024

Will likely need to submit an enhancement request to get any eyes on this. ESRI changed the status to Implemented and doubtful they will even see this old thread. QGIS 3.2+ offers great, consistent stream mode digitizing. Frustrating to have to rely on different software, but it works.

‎01-05-2023

shouting into a hurricane on this one, I think esri considers this resolved even though its still essentially useless.

‎12-16-2022

Excellent idea. We do this frequently as well and it is cumbersome to implement switching between map the map series for one pane and bookmarks for the other pane. It works but is time consuming and not efficient for layouts with more than 10 pages.

‎12-14-2021

Appreciate the improved stream mode digitizing performance with version 2.9 but suggest it is still lacking when compared with the implementation in ArcMap. Stream mode tolerance remains somewhat random, vertices are created at very irregular intervals no matter what tolerance is entered. One of the most significant differences is how how vertices are shown in real time and "on-the-fly" in ArcMap, this improves the overall experience. In Pro you see a dashed line and vertices only appear after completing the edit.

‎11-18-2021

Just FYI there is an enhancement request for this ability but has not been implemented yet. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/change-default-symbology/m-p/1118374#M47997

‎11-10-2021

Is there any way to create custom measured hatch labels in Pro that alter the format of the $measure lable? I would like to label measured hatches from standard label like m value = 25,300 to 253+00. This is simple to do in Arcmap but can't figure out how to make it happen in Pro. Currently when using Attribute Mapping and setting an expression for a measured hatch label as $measure, it doesn't seem possible to perform custom expressions in the expression builder dialogue.

‎04-06-2021

Yes that is what I would like to do. Good to know its coming in future release but disappointing to add another very basic feature to the "missing" bin. Thanks for quick response.

‎04-06-2021

How do you change default symbology for feature classes?

‎01-29-2021

If your polygons are part of the same feature dataset you can use the Edit - Clip tool and choose the option to discard the area that intersects. You will need to delete the overlapping polygon after the clip operation to create the "donut" hole effect.

‎01-28-2021

Any idea when this most basic of functions will be implemented? Feels like we are paying a lot of money to beta test software sometimes.

‎01-26-2021

Its been two years and this tool is still not properly implemented. The stream tolerance is not adhered to and vertex distance appears somewhat random and unpredictable.

‎01-26-2021

Stream mode digitizing is still nonfunctional and essentially broken in Pro 2.7. In Arcmap you set a stream tolerance and vertices are created at the specified interval and visibly appear as the mouse is dragged along. In Pro, it is seemingly random how the software decides to create a new vertex while engaged in streaming mode digitizing. Setting the tolerance to 20 feet results in vertices roughly 80-100 feet apart, setting at less than 5 feet results in 4-10 feet spacing, setting it at zero results in imprecise "jagged" results. The results are so horribly inconsistent the tool is practically useless (for my purposes and especially when compared to Arcmap). Please just implement this tool in the same manner as Arcmap or at least give that option.

‎08-14-2020

Scott, The error is as described, a simple edit-merge fails with overlapping or adjacent polygons with no additional information provided in the Pro interface. The inserted screenshot shows an example. I cannot locate additional information why this process is failing, it just says failed. The same process with the same dataset will merge correctly in ArcMap 10.8. Check geometry does not return any warnings. If i create a new empty feature class and trace in new features using the old feature class as the trace source, I can merge successfully so the issue does appear limited to some particular issue with the dataset.

‎08-14-2020

Simple edit task, merging two adjacent polygons, task fails with red warning text that it failed with no additional information. Hovering over the red error message does not pop-up any additional information. In the rare case when I can successfully merge adjacent features in Pro 2.6, the result is always a new multipart polygon irregardless if the polygons share a boundary or are overlapping. Process works just fine in ArcMap 10.8 using the same source geodatabase and feature class.

‎04-09-2020

I get this same error very frequently with Pro and believe it is related to the file path for the output table. Any path with a space or too many characters causes the error 99999 but changing the output table to a default GDB with a short name like c:\Temp\fake.gdb it typically works correctly.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎02-16-2024 02:13 AM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by IanPryor1

Re: Please fix stream mode digitizing

Re: Please fix stream mode digitizing

Re: Use Multiple Map Series in Single Layout

Re: Please fix stream mode digitizing

Re: changing the default symbol for XY point data

Measured hatches custom labels

Re: Change default symbology

Change default symbology

Re: polygon one inside the other and solid hatch between them

Re: Horizontal legend for raster files

Re: Stream Mode Digitize in 2.3 - unstable

Please fix stream mode digitizing

Re: Merge edit tool, buggy and non functional with 2.6

Merge edit tool, buggy and non functional with 2.6

Re: Locate Features Along Routes tool - Pro specific problems

Re: changing the default symbol for XY point data

Change default symbology

Re: Change default symbology

Please fix stream mode digitizing