Latest Contributions by PaulGiroux1

@LizArmstrong , is there a public roadmap for this release. I'm actively using the; "create workforce project > hang Survey123 Connect off the front end for public reporting > extend the Assignments FC for use with Field Maps > Hang a new Field Map off of these new fields > link to it in workforce > Update assignment statuses as part of the field map workers duties, etc." hack so would be nice to know when I should start holding off on building these so I can jump on the new integrated release. ... View more

The item renaming that worked for me was of the Workforce Project's main hosted feature layer, so 👍 to @entegroIreland & @MarkGiesbrecht3 for figuring it out.  I was like 🤔 looking for the obvious (go in Workforce and edit the project name) but not lucky until I found this thread. I had already junked up this folder with layer views and other AGO clutter so it was less obvious than it should have been. So what worked for me: Don't try to rename a workforce project in workforce. Just rename it's main feature layer 🤣. ... View more

Update: Tried the GlobalID in Title hack but when I pass from WF to Field Maps, it still triggers a collect new and not edit existing. A just good enough for now works by: 1. In App Integration, Pick a specific Field Map but I do NOT map fields from WF to F Maps (I tried everything but it just triggers a collect). So... pick a map, don't pass fields. 2. Mobile Workforce, users select Open In Field Maps which drops a pin at the right location, then from the "What's here", they can simply select the Feature and edit in field maps then close the work order right in the Field Maps interface.  OLD WORKFLOW - get's around the crews having to 1. Open in Workforce, 2. Select Open in Field Maps, 3. Doing Maintenance by  collecting new in a separate feature layer then 4. Remembering to go in Workforce to close the work, etc.  Note: 4. will often be forgotten, frustrating Dispatch NEW (HACKY WORKFLOW) 1. Open in Workforce, 2. Select Open in Field Maps, 3. Select Assignment in "What's Here" 4. Do maintenance in Field Maps against the extended Assignments layer, 5. Update Assignment status & fields then save which immediately takes effect in Workforce for dispatch & public reporting maps*. Pros: More streamlined, easier, better for dispatch, better for field Cons: Does not immediately edit the right feature in Field Maps (aka eliminate 3. in HACKY WORKFLOW). Note: Hacky but delicious. This workflow will ... um... flow work better. Esri, hurry and get Workforce and Field Maps integrated pronto! I'll buy you (um, well, just 1 employee) snacks when you do!               * Yup, we have a Survey123 Connect project that hangs off the same Feature Layer and does some cool lookups like the streetlight number, address, etc. Fun!   ... View more

Hi @David , any luck with this. I have a workforce assignments feature layer I extended with a public survey123 form for reporting (creates unassigned workforce assignments for dispatch). I extended the same Assignments layer with maintenance related fields for field crew work (using field maps).   I'm basically using one FC then wanting Workforce to open the field map with the same GlobalID but it doesn't show on the field map side. I tried adding an expression FromWFGlobalID in the field map to see if it would show in the field map fields list when mapping Workforce to Field Maps.  Can you tell me what/how to config the pop up to pass the workforce assignment globalid to the globalid which is a match in my field map since I use the same jury rigged feature layer? cc @CraigGillgrass  ... View more

@AndreasHall , can you  expand on your comment a bit. As you can see in my comment above from 01-31-2023 that I'm still trying to figure it out. Are you suggesting I just have to tweak some Zoom level somehow and then it will successfully trigger the selection? ... View more

Fantastic. I figured there had to be a way. Thanks for showing us how. ... View more

Thank you and yes, in the local utility where these events are being held, 1 hour time slots are the only way to go as we can only have small batches of employees off desk at a time to ensure we maintain our regulated service levels (ex. customer service, etc.). It also allows us to get better throughout the day. Thanks for the Badge! ... View more

@SeanKMcGinnis, you mentioned working on other methods to keep connections active. First, can you confirm what @RobertAnderson3 said about the 90 day time out? If that's correct, then I'm gold but if it's still 14 days, then I'll need to find other methods (API key, etc?). I have a public Survey123 form so not sure the longest period before the form is used to report an issue so I want to make sure my flow it stays alive, regardless. We're also building flows with ArcGIS webhooks wanting to control this for those also. ... View more

Hi @KimBaillieul , any luck with this? ... View more

Hi Kylie: Could this workflow above (Survey123 to Workforce) be used safely to extend for public . I would like to consolidate into one feature layer, so 1. build a Workforce Project, add fields for public contact info (email, phone, etc.) then create a view layer and 2. design in Survey123 desktop. Then setup web form reporting that adds assignments to workforce (unassigned) to report by 3. Collaborate/share the  Survey123 Web Form > Everyone can submit > Only add new records. My problem is ensuring that this workflow does not expose the data in the layer to the public which I know you can do with Survey123. I was never successful with Geoform in the past. Our workforce dispatchers can then assign and our crews will then use Field Maps. Ideally, we would put all in one assignments layer but integrating apps in Workforce would be ok if we can pass the asset id from the captured one on the survey123 map into the Workforce app. Anyone doing something like this now ... any examples or blog posts for this workflow Public 123 > Into Workforce > Data managed in Field Maps ... View more

Finally!!! https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/mapping/introducing-related-record-editing-in-map-viewer/ ... View more

Yes, that's a great suggestion. ... View more

+1... in fact my assertion is that ArcGIS Monitor licenses needs to be covered by Enterprise License Agreements regardless of cores, number of servers, etc.    ... View more

Have you been able to get this to work with editing widget? In my app, when I pass the id in, it selects but it does NOT trigger a zoom. It does select the feature on the map and in table but does NOT trigger a change on the Edit or other widgets on the page. It's sorta half working. Is there something I need to config in Web Experience Builder itself? Maybe I'm missing data actions and bindings on the map widget or something?   ... View more