POST
|
Hello Zach, Hopefully you can help with a similar issue I'm having. All my pulldata functions work as expected until I update them with additional rows. I have a location field that is in the standard choices tab (not external). When the user selects a location, multiple other fields are populated like geopoint, latitude, longitude, elevation, and others. All choices and associated pulldata information originally published with the survey work correctly in 3.12 and 3.13, but whenever I manually add more choices (i.e., new locations) in the worksheet and data in the .csv the additional choices will not pull data. The new choices are in the survey to select, but no data gets pulled from the updated .csv when selected. Again, the data that was originally published with the survey still populates associated data. I've checked for additional empty columns, reserved symbols, etc., but haven't found any issues so far. Any thoughts? Greg
... View more
10-15-2021
03:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
861
|
POST
|
Hi James, Is the allowDeletes keyword in the work plan? Thanks! Greg
... View more
07-13-2020
11:20 AM
|
0
|
0
|
965
|
IDEA
|
I am in the same position. My organization uses Power Automate, which I use for email notifications when a Survey123 survey is submitted. It would be great to be able to automate feature report production and dissemination through MS Power Automate.
... View more
06-04-2020
04:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1538
|
POST
|
I'm having a similar issue where I have a nested repeat and the default values aren't being populated for any repeats, 1st, 2nd, or otherwise. I tried to minimal appearance trick and that didn't work. I've done some investigation and it looks as though the query in the bind:esri:parameters column is overriding the default values. I have some older data that aren't tagged with the value that I use as the bind query for the nested repeat. The parent repeats pull up in the inbox and the field app seems to assume each parent repeat will have a nested repeat and those nested repeats (without pulling data from the feature service) use the defaults I've set in Connect. The newer data that have the query tag for the nested repeat will not use defaults whatsoever. The inbox is pulling some data from the feature service, but most data for the nested repeat needs to be updated still and most of that data is the same for each record. So, defaults would work great here, but it seems that the inbox is pulling the empty data from those fields from the feature service rather than populating the defaults. I've found a not so great way around this issue by using calculations, but it isn't ideal as folks still have to click the refresh icon to get the data to calculate in the inbox.
... View more
04-22-2020
11:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1202
|
IDEA
|
It would be extremely useful to have a tabular view for nested repeats. The #1 complaint I get from users is they don't like having to click through repeats to see what they've already entered. We may have upwards of 50 repeats for a particular survey and it can be cumbersome and confusing to keep track of all that information. A tabular view would allow users to view the data already submitted without having to click an arrow to see previously submitted data. This is one area where our clunky, old Access database is better. Greg
... View more
03-10-2020
09:00 AM
|
2
|
0
|
3184
|
POST
|
Hi all, I have a set of surveys with nested repeats that all populate or pull data from an online feature service. Everything works just fine other than when users need to add records to a repeat (not just update the original record) in the inbox. What results is a new record (great!) with only those data that were selected by the user. All of the read only fields that the user doesn't interact with are blank in the duplicate records. To reiterate, when the user opens the inbox, the original record is there to be updated (in our instance these are test results). If additional records need to be populated, the user then selects the for the repeat. What happens next is the issue, all the identifying information (read only) that I pull from the feature service (using bind::esri::parameters) for that repeat disappears and the user updates the fields they can. We are left with the original repeat with all data correctly filled in, but any additional repeats only have those data that were updated by the user and none of the data pulled from the feature service. See below for an example. The record on the bottom is the original repeat record. Any help would be appreciated! Greg
... View more
02-28-2020
01:38 PM
|
0
|
1
|
309
|
BLOG
|
Hi James, I just sent the files you need to your email. Host_Test_Disease is a categorical string that is the result of a calculation based on a select_multiple question. Basically, for the parent record a user selects one more more disease categories. Based on this selection, repeat records are created (using the selected-at function) in the child table with the disease categories passed to each repeat. Host_Test_Disease does have a domain. The feature service was created when I first published via Survey123 Connect. However, I've since changed the domain list to reflect updated categories (i.e., I've changed the names). Thanks for your help! Greg
... View more
02-27-2020
01:36 PM
|
0
|
0
|
21672
|
BLOG
|
Hi James Tedrick, I'm hoping you can assist with an issue I have with feature reports. I have a report that includes a simple table for repeats. I have a conditional statement that filters based on a categorical field. Everything works fine (produces rows based on the number of repeats in the record) except one field in a particular repeat (${Host_Test_Disease} under Agent Tested). I'm able to pull data from other fields in the same repeat (e.g., Host_Specimen_Type and Host_Test_Type), but for some reason this field is always blank even if there is data in the feature service. Below is the table. Sample ID Field Number Host Species Age Sex Specimen Agent Tested Test Type Result ${#Host_Data}${#Host_Testing_Table} ${if Host_Testing_Table.Test_Lab==”VRDL”} ${Host_Data.Host_Sample_ID} ${Host_Data.Host_Field_Number} ${Host_Data.Host} ${Host_Data.Age} ${Host_Data.Sex} ${Host_Testing_Table.Host_Specimen_Type} ${Host_Testing_Table.Host_Test_Disease} ${Host_Testing_Table.Host_Test_Type} ${Host_Testing_Table.Host_Test_Result}${/}${/Host_Testing_Table}${/Host_Data} Any ideas? Thanks! Greg
... View more
02-26-2020
03:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
21672
|
IDEA
|
I currently have some nested repeats where the data in the child repeat gets entered through the inbox by a secondary user. For the most part this works great, however, the initial data input requires that all repeats be clicked through in order for them to be submitted properly. I have a calculation that pre-populates text in a field within the child repeat based on the selected-at function and a repeat index (e.g., once(count()). I would like that data to be automatically submitted without having to click through each record in the child repeat. If the initial data submitter doesn't click through all the records only the first repeat gets submitted. It seems like there should be an easy fix for this. Thanks!
... View more
09-18-2019
01:37 PM
|
1
|
0
|
289
|
IDEA
|
This would be a great addition to the Survey123 field app as well. We use the inbox to update repeated records entered by field biologists. The folks doing the updating currently have to click through and update dozens of records at a time. It would be much more efficient if repeats in the inbox or otherwise had the option to view and update in a tabular format. One additional idea is to allow records to be edited by dragging down a particular field, much like copying data in multiple rows in Excel. This would greatly enhance efficiency as many of the updated records have the same data (e.g., negative test results).
... View more
09-12-2019
09:02 AM
|
1
|
0
|
6297
|
POST
|
Hello all (James Tedrick) I have a question about bind::esri:parameters query syntax. Is there a way to query from more than one field with an OR operator? Background below... My organization does environmental testing for various diseases. To do this, I have created a complex set of forms with nested repeats that all submit to the same feature service. There are a set of forms that submit test result data for surveys that were already submitted by field workers. We have a couple of different laboratories that will use separate forms to submit test result data by editing already submitted data using the inbox. However, I am trying to have the test result forms pull only relevant data given the diseases that were selected to be tested and the labs that are submitting the data (our labs test for different diseases). For example, there are 6 diseases for which we test, but for a particular form I may only want to pull data for diseases 1 and 2. The form used by the field workers has a Disease field that is selected by a select_multiple question, which is then parsed into separate hidden questions (e.g., disease1, disease2, disease3, etc.) for querying. How do I set up a query in the bind::esri:parameter column to pull data from more than one column or category? When I have something like query="disease1='disease1'" it works like a charm. However, when I try and add another part to the query using an OR operator I get an error code. For example, query="disease1='disease1' OR disease2='disease2'" doesn't work (I get a 400 error code when attempting to refresh the inbox). Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
... View more
09-04-2019
02:27 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1766
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
2 | 03-10-2020 09:00 AM | |
1 | 09-12-2019 09:02 AM | |
1 | 09-18-2019 01:37 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
08-22-2022
08:38 PM
|