IDEA
|
@OwenGeo- Awesome feedback. Thank you. I would like to also reiterate the benefit of being able to isolate the StoryMap deployment files on a server or CDN outside of Enterprise/Portal instance from a maintenance, DevOps, and scalability perspective. Are there any plans for the option to download a compiled and minified version? This would be fantastic.
... View more
08-09-2021
08:36 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1528
|
IDEA
|
Hello, It would be very helpful if an AGOL Administrator could have greater flexibility when configuring CRUD (create, read, update, and delete) permissions across a Feature Service. For example here are some potential use cases which I am not seeing a way to address using the Feature Service, Host View Layer, and Web Map configuration options: Allow Group A to insert new records but only allow Group B to update records Column/Field level permissions (Group A can view and edit fields 1,2,3 and Group B can view and edit fields 4,5,6) I realize this is an epic feature request, but it would be extremely helpful from a configuration stand point. Thank you for your consideration.
... View more
08-09-2021
08:18 AM
|
2
|
2
|
754
|
POST
|
Hello, I am about to deploy a new Portal/Enterprise environment using the new Kubernetes deployment options. I wanted to know if it is possible to use an AWS Load Balancer with an assigned AWS SSL Certificate rather than supply my own .pfx and .pem file? Thanks. Cheers, Blair
... View more
08-04-2021
08:17 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1079
|
POST
|
I am logging what appears to be a bug/software defect with Field Maps and Feature Templates. Problem: I was unable to prepare a map for offline use when the Web Map referenced an empty Feature Layer with no records - and thus no Feature Template. You will get an immediate failure message when preparing the managed map areas or manually downloading the map areas from the phone. Solution: Create a new feature (and thus the Feature Template) before preparing your Field Map app for the field. You can delete the point after. Environment: AGOL Field Maps for iOS (App Version 21.1, Build 396) It would be great if this was better documented in online tutorials/help. Thank you Cheers, Blair
... View more
06-02-2021
03:29 PM
|
1
|
1
|
805
|
IDEA
|
Thank you @OwenGeo for your suggestions. I would still like to find a way to separate and isolate the web application files from the server. This would involve hosting the files on a separate web server or CDN from the GIS Server. This was an option before.
... View more
05-20-2021
11:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1751
|
IDEA
|
Hello- As an ArcGIS Pro user I would like to have an easier more efficient way of bulk exporting many layouts in an active ArcGIS Pro Project. I suspect there is an automation route via ArcPy, but it seem having a simple 'Bulk Export' option in the Layout context menu would be very helpful. The bulk export option would allow users to export multiple layouts based on an export format and folder path. Thank you for your consideration. Cheers, Blair
... View more
04-24-2021
06:24 PM
|
2
|
1
|
5212
|
POST
|
Hello, I wanted to find out if Field Maps supports the storage of attachments captured in the field while in a service area where there is no data connectivity (i.e. offline). My initial tests using airplane mode seem as though I cannot capture any new records once I have attached a photo record via attachments. Thank you for your time. Cheers, Blair
... View more
03-15-2021
01:34 PM
|
0
|
1
|
783
|
IDEA
|
It would be helpful if I could further tweak the CSS on specific Hub elements like the Search Bar so I can control positioning better. It appear only the Row Class Element supports CSS properties. Thank you for your consideration.
... View more
02-24-2021
03:24 PM
|
2
|
1
|
659
|
IDEA
|
I would love for the Enterprise software engineering team to consider adding a compression switch to the 'webgisdr' backup utility. Having the full directory compressed down to a single .zip or .tar file rather than a series of directories would help when configuring AWS S3 lifecycle rules to move Portal/Enterprise backups to Glacier etc. One file is easier to manage versus a number of directories. It would also potentially reduce the size of data moving over the wire. Thank you for your consideration.
... View more
02-05-2021
03:01 PM
|
0
|
1
|
708
|
POST
|
+1 for wanting to see a blog post or instructions on how to use Cognito with AGOL and Portal/Enterprise would be huge. Thank you!
... View more
02-05-2021
02:42 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2436
|
BLOG
|
@BrittanyBursonThanks Brittany for the quick response. It looks like Enterprise only supports SQL expressions and not Arcade expressions for field calculations. Can you clarify this for me please? I am not clear if there is a function that will allow me to traverse between the feature table and attachments table via SQL. An example would be very helpful since it appears that several comments in this post are related to problems trying to follow the pattern with Portal/Enterprise. Thank you.
... View more
02-05-2021
12:09 PM
|
0
|
0
|
7974
|
BLOG
|
@JenniferBell Can you describe how one can follow the same steps using Portal/Enterprise versus AGOL? It looks like the calculate field option via Arcade is not an option via Portal. Do you know when this functionality will be added? Thank you.
... View more
02-05-2021
11:01 AM
|
0
|
0
|
7991
|
POST
|
I would like Esri to consider adding the ability to store attachments tied to a hosted Feature Service layer to be stored in a Cloud Store such as S3, Azure Storage rather than on disk. The benefits of storing the data on S3 are several: 1) scalable, elasticity, 2) cheaper storage, 3) redundancy and disaster recovery. Thank you for your consideration.
... View more
01-27-2021
08:21 AM
|
2
|
1
|
760
|
POST
|
Up vote please https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-storymaps-ideas/continue-hosting-storymap-code-on-github-please-support-open/idi-p/1013999/jump-to/first-unread-message
... View more
01-12-2021
08:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1210
|
IDEA
|
I am testing out the new Attachment Viewer and really liking what I am seeing! One limitation that I have found is that I would like to not have to change the Attachment Viewer web application ID or Group ID to onboard a number of different users who have been restricted access to specific webmaps managed via Groups. New groups and users will be added regularly so making changes to the app configuration and re-publishing the application may not be ideal. I would like to suggest a more dynamic way to handle this. Thanks for your consideration.
... View more
01-06-2021
08:56 AM
|
2
|
0
|
1258
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
2 | 08-09-2021 08:18 AM | |
1 | 06-02-2021 03:29 PM | |
2 | 04-24-2021 06:24 PM | |
2 | 02-24-2021 03:24 PM | |
1 | 12-23-2020 11:40 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
09-17-2021
05:03 PM
|