POST
|
Hello James, just wanted to check in and see if this has been implemented as of April 2020. I need to use a text field to require a 12 digit number (integer limits input to 9 digits) with a preceding 4000, looking something like this 4000DDDDDDDD (D of course representing a 'digit'). If masks have not been added to the webform is there a possible constraint work around, Regex?
... View more
04-28-2020
08:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1531
|
BLOG
|
Did you have any luck in resolving this issue? I know it has been a while since you asked the question but I am still appending data that is in UTC. Any help would be great!
... View more
02-04-2020
07:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4695
|
BLOG
|
Did you ever find a solution that will allow you to append deltas as well as new records?
... View more
02-04-2020
07:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4695
|
BLOG
|
James Tedrick When the script runs and appends data to the enterprise (oracle 12) database, however I am still seeing the Sys_Transfer_Date in UTC. I referenced the link provided about to ensure I am using the appropriate TZ code in the confguration file, America/New_York, however it seems that the script isn't recognizing that setting. However, I am not getting any errors. Do you have any advice on how to rectify this?
... View more
02-04-2020
07:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4695
|
POST
|
James, I was able to use the Beta Version to eliminate the null records, which is fantastic. However, my concern is users will accidentally hit the "plus" or "trash can" creating a bogus record(s) or unintentionally deleting records they want to submit. Is it possible to: a. Hide the interface that allows the user to add an add an additional record b. Or is there a way to designate which questions or groups of questions in a particular survey are published to which related table w/o using the begin repeat. The only reason I am using the begin repeat here is to generate a related table, not necessarily to allow the user to add multiple records. Thank you for your time and assistance. -Bill
... View more
08-28-2019
08:34 AM
|
1
|
0
|
345
|
POST
|
Hello James, Thank you for the prompt response. No problem, I will try the latest build, is there something specifically that I need to use in the "relevant" field or other way to potentially mitigate this issue? Best, Bill
... View more
08-23-2019
11:36 AM
|
0
|
0
|
345
|
POST
|
Ismael Chivite James Tedrick I am trying to consolidate a number of existing Survey123 forms into one form in order to simplify backend processing and reporting and also enhance the end user experience. Currently, each survey is comprised of 10-15 questions, with a Y/N/NA/Other response choices, when other is selected a conditional text field is conditionally formatted and stores an outlier response. The driving force behind the redesign is to capture more granular detail from the end user, instead of the “Y,N,N/A,Other” format, we would like to provide a series of domain/list of choices that we have identified as common issues or violations for each question, which will also include Yes (compliant), N/A, Other. Our desired structure in Survey123 & ArcGIS Online will look like the following: Site – Parent Table – Containing Site Specific Detail (Address, City, State etc.) FQA Survey approx. 20 Surveys comprised of at least 10 questions – Related to Parent In our initial design we are using the <begin group> to group each FQA aesthetically, followed by <begin repeat>, which creates the related table, and use one select_one question for compliance and a select_multiple in the instance where non-compliance was found and the ability to select multiple violations per question. When using the select multiple function, I am also employing the hidden field technique to avoid all selections being stored in one field as comma separated values. Yes – Compliant N/A – Not Applicable No – Show Select Multiple list of common infractions, where one or many can be chosen, including Other. Other – Conditional Text Box Appears where user can enter what the issue is/was. The challenge we are trying to overcome in the XLS Form is, using the begin repeat function, when the end user doesn’t not fill out all surveys, which will be the majority of the time, we get Null records in each related table that is not filled out of applicable to the site observation being performed. Is there a way to have a site table, related to multiple observation tables, and not have all groups filled out, and still not have records (null) created for each group that has not been used during a specific observation?
... View more
08-23-2019
09:46 AM
|
0
|
3
|
442
|
POST
|
Johnathan, Thank you for your reply. I am having difficulty doing this, I am still getting the message that the data will be overwritten. Can the feature service be shared when trying to make this change? Also, the field I am adding is an integer field that is required in Survey123, but I cannot change whether or not the field is required in the feature service, which is odd because I am the owner of the feature service and the survey. I appreciate your help. Best, Bill Walsh
... View more
04-26-2018
09:30 AM
|
0
|
4
|
2069
|
POST
|
I have an existing survey with approximately 10k records, some with attachments, so without. The challenge I face is to add a field, simple text field no more than 10 characters and republish for our users to continue using. My understanding is that I cannot make a schema change without losing all previously collected data, thus requiring a rebuild of the survey, download of current data, publish new survey and load data. The problem with this workflow is that I have scripts that reference CreationDate which is used as an accountability measure for when the survey is completed. When I download an republish the current data the original CreationDate is overwritten for the SysDate, which is a major problem for historic reporting. I would appreciate any help!!! Thanks, Bill
... View more
04-25-2018
08:35 AM
|
0
|
6
|
3692
|
POST
|
Morgan, Thank you for following up. Do we have to be using ArcGIS Enterprise 10.5 in order for this update to work? Best, Bill Walsh | •PSE&G | Perfomance Measurement Analyst Utility Technologies | Geospatial 40 Cragwood Road South Plainfield, NJ Tel 908-412-3238 | Cell 973-705-0015 <http://www.pseg.com> <http://www.facebook.com/pseg> <http://www.twitter.com/psegdelivers> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/pseg> <http://energizepseg.com/> PSEGSC
... View more
10-23-2017
11:38 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1198
|
POST
|
Hello Kylie, is there a current work around if you have a template database that requires layers to be M & Z Aware? We are currently using the UPDM data model, and are publishing feature services from that database to be edited in the field using Collector. We would like to adhere to this data model as much as possible what is ESRI's suggested work around in the interim. Best, Bill Walsh
... View more
09-25-2017
10:46 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1198
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 08-28-2019 08:34 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
11-11-2020
02:25 AM
|