POST
|
Shana, Yes I was hoping that the neighborhood or city would appear as suggestions when I user was typing but it is clear that this is only based on the city so we have settled on that being good enough for our service as neighborhood will still be provided in the match. Thank you for following up on this! Stephanie
... View more
06-01-2021
08:11 AM
|
0
|
0
|
732
|
POST
|
Has anyone found any other solutions to this? My issue is definitely not based on getting the incorrect item in my search as I am using a content.get on the item id instead of the search. It also works fine with a manual overwrite from Pro. I have tried changing the layer name when publishing and that doesn't seem to help or hurt the situation.
... View more
05-17-2021
07:01 AM
|
1
|
0
|
901
|
POST
|
I have published a multirole locator as a geocode service from ArcGIS Pro 2.7.1 to ArcGIS Server 10.7.1 and would like to clean up the REST end point before we make it public. I Would just like to keep the first entry in English for the Address field. I set the language code to English before publishing the service, is there anything else I can do? I would also like to populate the service description but I can't seem to figure out where that is pulling from. Thank you for any advice!
... View more
03-15-2021
08:03 AM
|
0
|
1
|
486
|
POST
|
I am using the create locator tool in Pro 2.6 and I have noticed that only the input city name and alternate city names are suggested to a user. Is there a way so that after a user has typed a house number and a street name suggestions can also be pulled from the neighborhood or zone field to better utilize initial input data rather than having to add a bunch of alternate table records?
... View more
10-27-2020
12:04 PM
|
0
|
2
|
926
|
POST
|
Hi Brad, I can get this to work with a many to one relationship i.e. multiple roads in a city use the same city id to relate to one alternate city name. When I have multiple alternate city names however and am trying to relate these to multiple roads within the same city via the same city id, this is where I run into issues. Do you have any suggestions? I don't want to make separate entries in the alternate name tables for each feature as it is killing performance.
... View more
10-27-2020
10:31 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1218
|
POST
|
Brad, I have attempted your suggestion numerous times and I always get inaccurate city name suggestions when I do, I have no idea where these suggestions are coming from. I simplified my data model and tried to accomplish this with a subset of roads data with only one alternate city name suggested and I see the same thing, do you have any suggestions? Here is my input roads data with a few streets within the same town selected, you can see the left cityID field and the right cityID fields are all populated with the same id that is in the related alternate names table. You can see that Mercerville is the only possible alternate city name. Left City Attribution and alternate city names table: Right city attribution and alternate city names table: Here are the alternate city related inputs when I create the locator: Here is the suggestion I get for an address on one of the selected roads: Ewing is present in the alternate city name table but it is not the same as the full Ewing Township that is being suggested so I do not know where the suggestion is coming from: Thank you for your time! Stephanie
... View more
10-15-2020
08:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1218
|
POST
|
I have a dashboard that is pulling from a hosted feature service that is a table. The service is updated daily but the dashboard does not refresh properly after the update runs. I have tried setting a refresh interval on the service in the webmap and I have tried adjusting the cache control on the service itself. Is there a known issue with refreshing a dashboard that is pulling from a table?
... View more
10-07-2020
10:16 AM
|
0
|
1
|
376
|
POST
|
Sorry let me rephrase the question, that was if multiple features have the same alternate look up names. Based on the example at the bottom of the doc you sent. If two of my streets are in the same city ( Mills St and Center St in this example) rather than having a unique city id for each street to link to the alternates, I should be able to use the same one for the same alternates shown below where cityid 2170 is removed and replaced with 658 correct? Thank you
... View more
10-05-2020
11:11 AM
|
0
|
4
|
1218
|
POST
|
Hi Brad, thank you for your response. Yes it sounds like enhancing our address points is the way to go. Also, I am having a hard time envisioning how I could slim down the alternate city name table as you mentioned in instances where an address point has multiple alternate city names. Would you be able to provide an example or diagram of this? Thank you
... View more
10-05-2020
09:40 AM
|
0
|
6
|
2318
|
POST
|
Shana, I would love to get the multirole locator to work, hopefully you can point out something I am doing wrong. Here is an example of where I would like the point result returned(result B) rather than result A. I have a pop-up from the input address point data up on the right and the input road segment selected so that you can see the only element missing from the address points is the zip code which I believe is the reason the point gets a lower score. You can see that the street join ids between the address point and the road are the same. I was under the impression that if the street join ids linked the points and the roads together you could use that relationship to fill in missing attributes from one to the other but I cannot get this to work. Possibly it is because the input fields are different for Point address roles and street address roles so none of the input fields names will ever match (city vs left city/right city or zip vs left zip /right zip) and if I cannot fill in missing attributes in the points there will be many instances where the interpolated position along a road receives a higher score than the more accurate point address. In reference to the alternate city name tables, there are no duplicates but each point has it's own record for the same alternate name so it adds up. I was told this was correct by tech support, but if I can use a one to many relationship in someway to cut this down that would be great. Thank you!
... View more
10-01-2020
11:27 AM
|
0
|
8
|
2318
|
POST
|
Shana, Correct, I am creating two separate locators and adding them to a composite. Unfortunately combining them into a multirole locator does not seem to work because even though I enter the address points above the roads that hierarchy does not persist in the results. So, there could be a match in my address points that has a score of 91 and a match from my roads input that gets a score of 96. Ideally I want any match from the address points over 85 to be returned even though the score is lower than the match from the roads. Perhaps I am missing something but I only see a way to set score thresholds for all roles collectively rather than on individual roles to prevent this from happening. Both of my locators have an alternate city name table and an alternate street name table. I have tried tweaking the settings provided in the performance documentation and they don’t seem to speed up batch performance. There is an id that links the address points to the street centerlines, how can I use that my advantage? Thank you so much for your help!
... View more
09-28-2020
01:31 PM
|
0
|
10
|
2318
|
POST
|
I have published a geocode service from a composite locator which was created via the create locator tool in ArcGIS Pro 2.6.1. The Locator covers the entire state of New Jersey so it includes nearly 4 million address points along with road centerlines. With that being said maximizing performance has been a big issue. I have a table of address that I batch geocode in ArcGIS Pro as part of the performance testing. This table takes me 4 minutes and 30 seconds to complete. I noticed however, that when I leave out the state from my inputs the table takes 56 seconds to complete. The state values are all NJ in the input data used to create the locator and they are all NJ in the table I am batch geocoding. I am curious why there is such a big difference in performance and how I can assure that faster performance is achieved by our users. I could leave the state values out of my input data or provide guidance to users to not enter a state, but neither of these are ideal.
... View more
09-23-2020
10:46 AM
|
0
|
15
|
3684
|
POST
|
BUG-000127864. This issue seems to have been resolved in Pro 2.6
... View more
09-23-2020
10:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1148
|
POST
|
Thank you, very helpful I know there are true curves in the database so I suspect that is what is causing the issue, I will test that out. Thanks again!
... View more
04-20-2020
05:47 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1148
|
POST
|
I ended up opening a case with ESRI and yes the advice given was to export to a shapefile. This worked for me. I was told this bug should be addressed in Pro 2.6. Thanks for your help Robert!
... View more
04-14-2020
05:38 AM
|
2
|
2
|
1148
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 05-17-2021 07:01 AM | |
1 | 04-09-2020 07:48 AM | |
2 | 04-14-2020 05:38 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
12-11-2023
02:46 PM
|