POST
|
Hello, Our client is familiar with the option to work with Trimble Catalyst in Collector for arcgis, They want to work with Trimble Catalyst in Survey123, the problem is - they can't get the MSL. They use Trimble Mobile Manager , we can see that in the TMM app there are two values for altitude - HAE and MSL. but they always get HAE. they set the altitude type in the survey app to MSL - but it is not working. *They are working with android. later we found out in the log file of TMM , that it's output includes only HAE (no MSL or geoid separation). the NMEAL Log file is attached. Product Configuration Guide | Trimble Geospatial I have oppened a support case about this issue 3 month ago in may 2020..but we didn't get a solution. Is there a way to get MSL in survey 123 with Trimble Catalyst? James Tedrick Marika Vertzonis Thank you, Rima
... View more
08-26-2020
11:49 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1532
|
POST
|
Thank you Heather, The workaround you suggested seems to work. We will offer that to our potential client. Thank you, Rima.
... View more
08-19-2020
12:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
946
|
POST
|
Hi, We have a potential client who wants to move to vrp solution (right now they are using some other, non Esri, technology). The only functionality they can't seem to find is the option to prioritize some of the stops. I was looking for a solution and found a few discussions : VRP With Priority Stops (orders) Order Priority/sequence In one of them it was mentioned to use the Revenue field (didn't work for me), another solution was solving the problem with 2 steps: 1. use AssignmentRule of "override"(3) to the prioritized stops, and an AssignmentRule of "exclude"(0) to all the other stops, then solve (this step makes a route only to the prioritized stops). 2. change the AssignmentRule of the prioritized stops to "Preserve route and relative sequence"(1)/"Preserve route"(2), and an AssignmentRule of "override"(3) to all the other stops, then solve. The 2 step solution didn't work either - if i'm assigning "Preserve route and relative sequence"(1) to the prioritized stops - solve returns an error. if i'm assigning "Preserve route"(2) to the prioritized stops - the route is created but the stops are not prioritized - they are ordered one after another - but not in the beginning of the route. another potential solution i found - was to assign to all the prioritized stops the AssignmentRule of "Anchor first" (4) but this option only takes one stop. In a scenario where there are (for example) 40 stops , while 6 of them are in high priority and need to be reached first - what is the right way to generate a route? * we would want the route between the 6 prioritized stops to be optimized as well. I'm adding a shapefile layer that i used while trying to reach a solution. Heather Moe
... View more
08-17-2020
03:20 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1010
|
POST
|
Our client have the same issue, is there anything new? The "untrusted host" error repeats both on Explorer and Collector.
... View more
07-09-2020
05:55 AM
|
0
|
1
|
463
|
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
10-28-2021
01:29 AM
|