POST
|
PierreloupDucroix, Again, it depends a bit on what version of ArcGIS Enterprise you are using, and plan to use. We're adding subtype group layer support with each new version- the goal is to have parity with ArcMap across the platform (web, field, desktop). That said, functionality is evolving at a different rate across these three, and if what you need isn't available on one of those platforms, you might have to revert to using regular feature layers. I hope this helps, --Rich
... View more
02-01-2024
04:15 PM
|
0
|
1
|
191
|
POST
|
It depends a bit on what version of Enterprise you are using and when you think you will upgrade to 11.3 (forthcoming later this year). We added a lot of Subtype Group Layer support to the Map Viewer in 11.2 (not a Network Management release) and 11.3. The definition query strategy you outlined above will certainly make multiple queries, and is the main reason we added subtype group layers to the platform. If you ever want to take utility network data offline, sync only works if you have a maximum of one layer per feature class; that's another reason to use Subtype Group Layers. If you're using an older version of ArcGIS Enterprise and want to use Map Viewer, you are right that subtype group layers are unfortunately not a good solution. --Rich
... View more
01-30-2024
02:39 PM
|
0
|
0
|
314
|
POST
|
@DasheEbra , Have you edited the config.js file on your Portal machine has documented in this blog post (in the section titled "How to configure the utility network's offline capability")? --Rich
... View more
11-20-2023
09:48 AM
|
0
|
0
|
249
|
POST
|
@DaveFullerton No changes here. I'm not familiar with the CIM*** classes, but if you have a reproducible case you can share with tech support, they can send it to us for investigation. --Rich
... View more
09-21-2023
10:16 AM
|
0
|
2
|
131
|
POST
|
First, I assume that __user__ has read/write access to the default version, right? A great way to verify this is try to make an identical edit using the ArcGIS Pro user interface. Another thing to try would be to use the low-level geodatabase routines- using Geodatabase.ApplyEdits, etc. Not good for a production app- for example, you'd have no undo/redo, but the error messages might be better. --Rich
... View more
09-14-2023
03:31 PM
|
0
|
0
|
382
|
POST
|
Siva, The Pro SDK is perfectly capable of working with Enterprise geodatabases, regardless of whether or not the tables and feature classes are in the map. You can start reading here to see how to connect. The Enterprise SDK is designed to build server-side extensions. Using it on the desktop is not supported and extremely unlikely to work. --Rich
... View more
09-14-2023
08:54 AM
|
0
|
1
|
394
|
POST
|
Siva, This looks like ArcObjects code designed for ArcMap. ArcGIS Pro has a completely different API. The documentation home page is here. --Rich
... View more
09-13-2023
11:37 AM
|
0
|
1
|
426
|
POST
|
Here you go @FrancescoGiovinazzo General Enterprise SDK Info Working with Utility Networks Code sample showing how to execute a trace using fine-grained topology --Rich
... View more
09-07-2023
08:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
273
|
POST
|
Hi Francesco! The unfortunate fact is that there is no easy way to do this. In the geometric network, pages of the network index were read into memory, and navigating from edge to junction was a fast operation. As the utility network is services-based, each of these hops would require a REST call; this would not perform at all. Here are my recommendations: * Investigate whether the tracing tools can be used to return a small number of features. For example, you could set up a function barrier using Count to stop after a certain amount of hops * Use the Trace geoprocessing tool (via the geoprocessing API) and ask to return connectivity information (we're planning to add this to the Pro SDK soon) * Write a Server Object Extension using the Enterprise SDK. The Enterprise SDK, which runs on the server, has full access to fine-grained topology We are investigating other ideas to provide fine-grained topology for a small section of the network, but these are not something that is currently available. I hope this helps answer the question (even if it is not the answer you were hoping for), --Rich
... View more
09-05-2023
09:51 AM
|
0
|
2
|
313
|
POST
|
I don't know of any particular thing that would cause this error. Some troubleshooting tips- 1. Simplify the map to only one feature class to see if that works. Re-add layers one at a time to see if you can find one causing a problem. 2. If you're skilled with fiddler, you could compare the `query` calls generated by the SDK vs. the calls that are sent to the service after changing the moment in the Pro UI. (Passing the wrong moment?) Sorry I can't be of more help, --Rich
... View more
08-10-2023
08:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
666
|
POST
|
Jonathan, VersionManager.CreateHistoricalVersion is used to create a named historical version in an enterprise geodatabase. As you noted, that's not supported with feature services. To connect to an historical moment, create an HistoricalVersion object using VersionManager.GetHistoricalVersion(DateTime), then pass it to ChangeVersion as your code sample above already shows. I hope this helps, --Rich
... View more
08-04-2023
12:01 PM
|
1
|
1
|
760
|
POST
|
Since the utility network is primarily a services-based system, access to fine-grained topology is not available on the client, which includes the Pro SDK. If the existing analytics framework is not sufficient for your use cases, you can write a custom Server Object Extension using the Enterprise SDK. This SDK, which runs on the server, provides IForwardStar-like capabilities. I hope this helps answer the question. --Rich
... View more
07-10-2023
08:04 AM
|
0
|
0
|
230
|
POST
|
Antoine, I think you can do everything but the HAVING clause using the table statistics methods described here. --Rich
... View more
05-26-2023
08:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
498
|
POST
|
I can't speak for the rest of the Pro SDK, but on the geodatabase side, we have the following "big-ticket" issues that we're looking at: New field data types Core linear referencing Versioning conflicts Geodatabase sync Edit changes
... View more
05-25-2023
07:53 AM
|
1
|
1
|
344
|
POST
|
Unfortunately, there's not yet Pro SDK access to replica information (it's on the roadmap). @gpnobbir do you know if this can be done with geoprocessing/Python? --Rich
... View more
05-24-2023
05:09 PM
|
0
|
1
|
425
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 08-04-2023 12:01 PM | |
1 | 05-25-2023 07:53 AM | |
1 | 05-04-2023 09:25 AM | |
1 | 04-14-2023 12:18 PM | |
1 | 01-10-2023 03:35 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|