Latest Contributions by KansasDOT

Enhancement or Issue Description Application* Initial Notes RHUG Score LoE Notes Support for Alpha and related routes ArcMap 10/26/16 Will: A single route with a gap is another viable workaround (in addition to spliting into two routes) for fish routes. R&H current supports Lollipop routes. Fish routes require significant development effort to accomodate the various R&H logic, processes. FHWA has indicated that gaps along routes are not acceptable for HPMS. Some DOT's reporting event measure issues using the single route workaround. Will is willing to follow up on these issues and believes R&H should support. There is currently an overarching issue including various types of routes: Alpha, Loop, Branch, Fish, Lollipop, etc. / NC - R&H does not support fish routes. ADOT currently limits bifurcations in it's route system. It would be interested in native support from Roads and Highways as it would allow some "real world" route geometries to be modeled. From Agile docs: "The definition of good quality includes that there will be one and only one record per route, that the vertex measures will be strictly increasing with digitizing direction (for all LRMs), that no measures for a given route are ambiguous (for all LRMs), and that the route dominance rules are in place and working" 16 Very High Requires code level support in in all tiers of the software: Rotue editing, calibration, event editing, … RHUG: Top Priority among High LOE for next release. Should also be supported at 10.5 (at least) through patch. Needed to meet FHWA HPMS requirements and support Agile integration. "Cover" event behavior ArcMap 10/26/16- Idaho DOT highlighted this issue as having a large impact on event QA/QC processes.  Existing workarounds do not work for external events and there was general consensus that adding the "cover" behavior would be a be time saver for managing continuous events.  Several DOTADOT - this "cover" behavior should closely mimic the behavior already in place for cartographic realignments.  MN:  What is your definition of "cover"?  NC:  Move behavior can leave little gaps when it's supposed to be full coverage- Cover would ensure full coverage of the event after the edit. 11 High RHUG: Remains High priority for implementing states.  Would like to include in upcoming release but can not defer alpha route fix ... View more

I like using Pydev for Eclipse, so when at first I had to set up the Pydev interpreter for ArcGIS Pro and the conda install, I ran into a snag.   In Eclipse (or Jupyter, or other) you can choose your python install and manage your python path.  This is pydev for eclipse Luna.  Eclipse - project - properties - PyDev - Interpreter/Grammar settings: I changed my grammar version to 3.0, and click to configure an interpreter not listed: Here is my default interpreter for my ArcGIS 10.4.1 environment: I created a new environment and chose the python.exe at the "propy path" documented here using-conda-with-arcgis-pro at the ArcGIS\Pro\bin\python\envs\arcgispro-py3 directory: and now my pydev for eclipse works in the ArcGIS Pro 1.4/conda interpreter.   What threw me off originally, and prompted this thread: python.exe exists in multiple locations under my Pro directory, and the envs directory was not the first place I found a python.exe for eclipse to use.   ... View more