Latest Contributions by SteveDuquette

Hi Sarthak Oh well, this is one of these moments...when you feel so embarrassed you just don't want to reply  🙂 I completely missed the commented section in the XML... I am sure that it will work as expected now!   🙂 At least it's Friday....thanks for your help! Steve ...aka the guy who will look more for commented sections in the XMLs from now on! 🙂 ... View more

Bjron Me again I think the xml is not being read or at least the variables are not being fed the value of the xml.  if i go in the mxml and change the following: private var addFeatures:Boolean = false; private var deleteFeatures:Boolean = false; private var updateGeometry:Boolean = false; private var updateAttributes:Boolean = true; Seems to do the trick...and the delete option is gone as well. Steve ... View more

Hi Bjorn Well I figured out the 3.0 thing...I was not using the 4.6.0 SDK...so now the flex viewer 3.0 is working. BUT I still have the same issue.  I wan't my users to only be able to edit the attributes and not the geometry...so if I go in the xml of the edit widget (EditWidget.xml) and I set it up like this: <addfeatures>false</addfeatures>     <deletefeatures>false</deletefeatures>     <toolbarvisible>true</toolbarvisible>     <toolbarcutvisible>false</toolbarcutvisible>     <toolbarmergevisible>false</toolbarmergevisible>     <toolbarreshapevisible>false</toolbarreshapevisible>       <updategeometry>false</updategeometry>     <updateattributes>false</updateattributes>     <showcreatorfield>true</showcreatorfield>        <showcreationdatefield>true</showcreationdatefield>        <showeditorfield>true</showeditorfield>        <showeditdatefield>true</showeditdatefield> Where I put extra attention on updategeometry - set to false....in the app I still can edit the geometry...and same goes for the deletefeatures... I hope you can give me a hand...cause this issue is still the at 3.0 Steve Duquette ... View more

Hi Bjorn... This is in 2.5 I am not able to run 3.  Tried it and it won't even display a tiled map...maybe it's because we are still using 10 and not 10.1 for our server side services...or something else...i've been using flex for some time and it's the first time I've encountered something like this (version 3 refusing to run)...I've downloaded everything again today (I was hoping version 3 would not do this)...the flex viewer and the flex api...referenced the API swf in the project....put in a 10.0 web tiled service...and won't work...pretty basic...don't know what I am doing wrong! Steve ... View more

Hi I am facing the same issue...any luck on this? Steve Duquette Parks Canada ... View more

Thanks kenbuja That worked...I was to focused on trying to specify the depth of those layers instead of looking at the map component itself....I Implemented this with an event on "added" on the graphic layer with this (if others read the post):    private function fLayer_graphicAddHandler():void{ map.reorderLayer("MaCoucheGraphique", map.layers.length); } And in the xml: <esri:GraphicsLayer click="graphic_clickHandlerParks(event)" added="fLayer_graphicAddHandler()" graphicProvider="{SharePoint.result}" id="MaCoucheGraphique"/> Thanks again! Steve ... View more

Hi There... Sorry for the late responce...but just in case someone hits this page: You can do that in 9.3.1 with this code: http://resources.esri.com/help/9.3/ArcGISDesktop/dotnet/4EC15E04-CF70-47B4-A02C-E24AEAC3B981.htm Of course when you do it like that your moving the data from one spot to the other...but you are preserving your Global IDs. Then you create a replica using existing data....and your good to go from that point on! Not perfect but might be a suitable solution for some... Steve Duquette Geospatial servers and applications specialist / Spécialiste, serveurs et applications géospatiales Stratégies et plans / Strategy and plans Parcs Canada, Parks Canada I can't really see what is new here in 9.4. This technical article: http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.techarticles.articleShow&d=34200 describes how you can setup one way child to parent replicas and it was already there for 9.0. What does 9.4 add to this? I was hoping the new thing in 9.4 would be that there is no need to copy all data into the parent first. It is the moving of data with globalIDs that I would like to avoid. We have a set of 'orphan' child geodatabases without a parent. I would like a parent GDB simply to 'adopt' these child GDBs and accept data from them. The initial sync, or setting up the replication, would get all existing data from the child GDB tables and feature class into the parent. Pasi ... View more