IDEA
|
i agree - and would like to add a special case: prevent users from publishing to the root folder
... View more
02-29-2024
11:31 PM
|
0
|
0
|
128
|
IDEA
|
Currently (as of release 11.1) service webhooks only support non-hosted data (data in an enterprise geodatabase) where the data is not registered as versioned. Working with versioned data is a central part of many workflows using either branch or classic versioned data. Support for webhooks in these workflows would be a great improvement.
... View more
01-03-2024
01:22 AM
|
6
|
1
|
324
|
POST
|
Answer from support references documentation: 'To configure webhooks for non-hosted feature services, the data the service references from the enterprise geodatabase must be nonversioned and have archiving enabled. At this time, webhooks do not support services with branch versioned data.' ( from Create (webhooks) ) I missed that in my reading....
... View more
01-03-2024
12:32 AM
|
1
|
0
|
307
|
POST
|
We would like to use webhoooks to send selected feature updates to other systems. We rely on maintaining data in featureclasses in an enterprise geodatabase. In our data maintenance workflow we use versioned featureclasses. But when we try to add a webhook on a feature layer with versioning it says "Feature Service requires non-versioned archiving data" I've tested both classic and branch versioning - same result. We run ArcGIS enterprise 11.1 (I haven't found any updates on this subject in 11.2) Have i missed something in the documentation - or should i post this in ideas section instead?
... View more
01-02-2024
04:56 AM
|
0
|
2
|
405
|
POST
|
I agree that access to bugs is important - but that is bound by esri policies - and quite another game (and for a completely separate thread...) I think it would be feasible to keep focus on sharing upgrade experiences (positive and negative) - and as a part of that knowledge about bugs is of course relevant.
... View more
11-15-2023
02:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
889
|
IDEA
|
I agree - and might add that it could also be convenient if an ArcGIS Enterprise group could map to more than one SAML group. All in all this might add up to: be able to manage AGE groups and SAML groups with a many to many relationship between the groups.
... View more
11-14-2023
02:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
73
|
POST
|
ArcGIS Enterprise 11.2 upgrade experience thread In the light of this summer "ArcGIS Web Adaptor 11.1 App Pool freezes" case i would suggest that we create an ArcGIS Enterprise 11.2 upgrade experience group or thread, so we can share and be aware of any problems as early as possible. I found the discussion and information in the ArcGIS Web Adaptor 11.1 App Pool freezes thread very useful and would like something similar for 11.2 upgrade. Maybe our esri hosts at the community could create a version specific upgrade sub group here? a group might make it a bit more structured than one single discussion thread
... View more
11-14-2023
01:12 AM
|
8
|
9
|
1012
|
POST
|
I just want to add to this discussion that it would be really nice if I could search for a specific bug on support.esri.com: Search with the BUG filter on > If the _exact_ bug number is matched Then - show the bug content OR return its status ('under review';'secret') if the content of the bug for any reason is unavailable to the user community Else if it's not found, return 'no such bug number' That would save us (me at least) a lot of time. (I haven't been able to do that in the new support site - but as i remember it was possible on the old site. disclaimer - i haven't studied the documentation of the new support search function yet 😀)
... View more
08-04-2023
05:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
766
|
BLOG
|
can't find this demo in the expo program for today. Should by my calulation be at 17:00 CET
... View more
10-27-2020
06:36 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1793
|
BLOG
|
Hi Larry (and Bill) I might add that for my part i would appreciate a more "formal" announcement of the Utility Release than in a blog (though i enjoy reading your blog). This information might exist somewhere - but where? It would be useful for our implementations planning - and as a source for news about bugs, release plans, changes in system requirements etc. Best regards Niels
... View more
11-10-2019
11:51 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3478
|
POST
|
In my opinion this looks lige a bug - based on your description. The behaviour should be consistent regardless of which application interprets the data. This 'feature' potentially invalidates some of the intended backend - field worker workflows, for which Collector is designed.
... View more
08-10-2017
11:27 PM
|
1
|
0
|
537
|
IDEA
|
This issue is solved in ArcGIS for AutoCAD 355 The speed for populating the list of services has improved significantly.
... View more
12-08-2016
02:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
511
|
IDEA
|
This issue is solved in ArcGIS for AutoCAD 355 The speed for populating the list of services has improved significantly.
... View more
12-08-2016
02:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
356
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 01-03-2024 12:32 AM | |
6 | 01-03-2024 01:22 AM | |
8 | 11-14-2023 01:12 AM | |
1 | 10-27-2020 06:36 AM | |
1 | 08-10-2017 11:27 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|