POST
|
@Jessica_Watson The issue has been fixed as part of ArcGIS Pro 3.6.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
49
|
POST
|
@GrantCountyGISSup This issue has been fixed as part of ArcGIS Pro 3.6
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
16
|
POST
|
@MichaelVolz The parcel fabric is part of the 'System Of Record' concept. As such we try to be as true to the legal record as possible. 200 lines might not be worth too much effort, but if you had 200,000 it would have been worth the effort to bring them in, assuming they are a good representation of the legal record they came from. Without seeing your data it is hard to provide any advice. Just keep in mind that in the parcel fabric: The COGO direction and the line direction (geometry) are assumed to be the same. You can run the geoprocessing tool Set Parcel Label Position and set the label to be right/left or centered. If you do end up recreating the lines and want the COGO dimensions to be close to the record, make sure to apply to correct ground to grid correction (combined scale factor and basis of bearing). I hope this helps
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
80
|
POST
|
Hello @MichaelVolz If you find business value in historic parcels, I would load them in. BUT... Make sure they align with the current parcels first. Ideally, you can populate the 'RetiredByRecord' field with the record that retired them, but if not: you can associate them all to a record called 'Inactive Legacy' (or similar). And if that's too much work, populate it with the guid '{DDDDDDDD-DDDD-DDDD-DDDD-DDDDDDDDDDDD}'. I hope this helps and that other organizations share their experiences. We are curious too.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
114
|
IDEA
|
@LECarver_JC If we follow this approach, it will have to seperate 'opening' the deed from 'reading' the deed. This will add at least one more mouse click - are you OK with that? Or should we instead add the ability to paste images from the clipboard?
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
76
|
POST
|
@GordonCourtney thank you for the quick turnaround! @Rafael_Bombacini is looking into it We would love to have more examples in which the OCR is correct, but COGO Reader failed.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
1
|
0
|
110
|
POST
|
@LeeGravel Web App Builder is being deprecated - see announcement here. It is being replaced with the Experience Builder, which is based on a newer version of java script (4.x). Do we have to make COGO Reader available to parcel fabric users on the web? yes When? not in the 'near-term'. We want to release the parcel fabric on ArcGIS Online first.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
66
|
POST
|
@GordonCourtney Can you please provide the deed you are using?
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
2
|
122
|
POST
|
@GordonCourtney we have done some work on non-tangent curve for ArcGIS Pro 3.6. Can you please provide us with a deed that is failing for you? If you cannot share it publicly in this post, you can also submit a technical support case or 'copy-paste' the portion of the extracted text that describes the parcel (metes-and-bounds)..
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
6
|
161
|
IDEA
|
@GordonCourtney We are unable to provide a concise timeline at this time. Not in the next year.
... View more
a month ago
|
0
|
0
|
116
|
POST
|
@Jessica_Watson This 1-minute video shows the process: https://youtu.be/o3mxHG9070s?si=g_nkIxMnn_XuLX5E
... View more
09-01-2025
11:46 PM
|
0
|
0
|
176
|
POST
|
The same issue was also mentioned here: https://community.esri.com/t5/plss-editing-questions/create-fixed-point-results-with-empty-xy/m-p/1630822#M50
... View more
09-01-2025
05:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
235
|
POST
|
Hello @Jessica_Watson We have noticed it as well and are working to fix it as part of ArcGIS Pro 3.6. As you have mentioned - it is not easy to consistently reproduce. Regardless, we recommend opening a case with technical support.
... View more
09-01-2025
05:43 AM
|
0
|
2
|
235
|
POST
|
We are working to fix it as part of ArcGIS Pro 3.6. We recommend opening a case with technical support.
... View more
09-01-2025
05:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
58
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 3 weeks ago | |
1 | 07-25-2025 06:07 AM | |
1 | 07-30-2025 02:19 AM | |
2 | 07-08-2025 08:11 AM | |
1 | 05-25-2025 11:32 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|