Confirming whether ArcGIS Pro is doing a Horizontal AND Vertical datum transformation between ITRF00 and ITRF08 for raster?

1074
5
10-24-2019 08:18 PM
FrancesBiles1
New Contributor III

Hello-

I am using ArcGIS Pro v 2.3.2 and am trying to project raster DEMs with a HCS and VCS in ITRF00 to ITRF08.

The Geographic Transformation method chosen is ITRF_2000_To_ITRF_2005_1 + ITRF_2005_To_ITRF_2008_2.

A screenshot of the what I entered in the Project Raster tool is below.  

Can someone confirm that both the horizontal and vertical values in the output raster will be transformed to ITRF2008?

I am looking for verification that the Z values (ellipsoid heights) are actually being transformed.

Project Raster screenshot of horizontal and vertical datum transformation from ITRF00 to ITRF08

0 Kudos
5 Replies
DanPatterson_Retired
MVP Emeritus

I can confirm what is says in the help

Project Raster—Data Management toolbox | ArcGIS Desktop 

To perform a vertical transformation, check the optional Vertical parameter on the dialog box. By default, the Vertical parameter is unavailable and is only available when the input and output coordinate systems have a vertical coordinate system (VCS), and the input feature class coordinates have z-values. Also, additional data (coordinate systems data) setup needs to be installed on the system
0 Kudos
BojanŠavrič
Esri Contributor

Both transformations, ITRF_2000_To_ITRF_2005_1 and ITRF_2005_To_ITRF_2008_2, are not null, Position Vector transformations with parameters. You can check them here: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/map/projections/pdf/geographic_transformations.pdf 

As Dan Patterson‌ already replied, you need to check the optional Vertical parameter, which you did. If your input heights were ellipsoidal, then your output should be ellipsoidal heights in ITRF 2008 withing the accuracy of the used transformations.

I hope this helps.

0 Kudos
FrancesBiles1
New Contributor III

Thank you Bojan and Dan. Yes, I had already checked the help and the transformations pdf and noticed the transformation parameters were correct (and not null). But that doesn't mean that behind the scenes the software is actually applying the vertical transformation portion. In ArcMap, for example, the same transformation (ITRF_2000_To_ITRF_2005_1 and ITRF_2005_To_ITRF_2008_2) can be applied to a raster DEM with a defined HCS & VCS, but in reality (b/c ArcMap will only do vertical transformations on vector data, but not on rasters), only the horizontal coordinates are transformed and nothing is applied to the vertical. Out of an abundance of caution I was looking for confirmation that in Project Raster the VCS transformation from ITRF00 to ITRF08 is truly being applied in ArcGIS Pro 2.3.2 (without having to install any separate Coordinate Systems Data file), as this is an important part of the workflow for one of our projects. 

On a second note, I just noticed in the Project Raster help that "This tool can only output a square cell size."  Our data is in Geographic/decimal degrees, ITRF00 and is being transformed to Geographic ITRF08. The pixel size is 0.000006 x 0.000006 degrees (i.e., same dimensions in x & y), but in a linear sense the size is a rectangle, not square. So now I am confused. Can I even use Project Raster when working in a geographic coordinate system?? Help!

0 Kudos
FrancesBiles1
New Contributor III

Ok...feeling a little silly about my paranoia. From everything in the help it sounds like Project Raster in ArcGIS Pro should be applying both the HCS AND the VCS transformations between ITRF00 and ITRF08; however if someone knows differently please correct me.  I'm still confused about "this tool can only output a square cell size" though, when coordinates are in degrees...

0 Kudos
DanPatterson_Retired
MVP Emeritus

the cell is square in spherical coordinates.

If you want planar coordinates, then you should project the data... but... read this

How the Cell Size Projection Method environment setting works—Geoprocessing | ArcGIS Desktop 

It was added in Pro 2.4 and is worth the read, especially if you want to use the data for anything that requires planar measures

0 Kudos